Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puny Express: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
<noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> |
||
:{{la|1=Puny Express}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puny Express|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 |
:{{la|1=Puny Express}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puny Express|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 6#{{anchorencode:Puny Express}}|View log]]</noinclude>) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Puny Express}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Puny Express}}) |
||
This is one of a very large number of articles on individual Woody Woodpecker cartoons, almost all of which were created by a user who was indeffed in 2015 for repeated copyright violations and sockpuppetry [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Oanabay04]]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Le_Cop_on_Le_Rocks] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pink_Pest_Control] for similar deletion discussions on a similar series of articles for Pink Panther cartoon articles. These discussions closed with a consensus to redirect them all to the appropriate list article, and I believe that redirecting all of these Woody Woodpecker cartoon articles to [[Woody Woodpecker filmography]] is called for here. |
This is one of a very large number of articles on individual Woody Woodpecker cartoons, almost all of which were created by a user who was indeffed in 2015 for repeated copyright violations and sockpuppetry [[Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Oanabay04]]. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Le_Cop_on_Le_Rocks] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pink_Pest_Control] for similar deletion discussions on a similar series of articles for Pink Panther cartoon articles. These discussions closed with a consensus to redirect them all to the appropriate list article, and I believe that redirecting all of these Woody Woodpecker cartoon articles to [[Woody Woodpecker filmography]] is called for here. |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::{{ping|Donaldd23}} The subject of the article has a less than 1 sentence mention in Who's who in Animated Cartoons, that's it. That hardly counts as sigcov. See here: [https://books.google.com/books?id=FVShFCjVzvIC&q=wally+walrus+woody+woodpecker&pg=PA198#v=onepage&q=puny%20express&f=false]. [[User:Trainsandotherthings|Trainsandotherthings]] ([[User talk:Trainsandotherthings|talk]]) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Donaldd23}} The subject of the article has a less than 1 sentence mention in Who's who in Animated Cartoons, that's it. That hardly counts as sigcov. See here: [https://books.google.com/books?id=FVShFCjVzvIC&q=wally+walrus+woody+woodpecker&pg=PA198#v=onepage&q=puny%20express&f=false]. [[User:Trainsandotherthings|Trainsandotherthings]] ([[User talk:Trainsandotherthings|talk]]) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
:::Again, THREE books is significant coverage, in my opinion. [[User:Donaldd23|<span style="color: darkblue">Donald</span><span style="color: darkgreen">D23</span>]] [[User talk:Donaldd23|<span style="color: orange">talk to me</span>]] 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC) |
:::Again, THREE books is significant coverage, in my opinion. [[User:Donaldd23|<span style="color: darkblue">Donald</span><span style="color: darkgreen">D23</span>]] [[User talk:Donaldd23|<span style="color: orange">talk to me</span>]] 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
<p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Natg 19|Natg 19]] ([[User talk:Natg 19|talk]]) 00:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Puny Express]]</noinclude></p> |
|||
Revision as of 00:18, 6 November 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Puny Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is one of a very large number of articles on individual Woody Woodpecker cartoons, almost all of which were created by a user who was indeffed in 2015 for repeated copyright violations and sockpuppetry Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Oanabay04. See also [1] and [2] for similar deletion discussions on a similar series of articles for Pink Panther cartoon articles. These discussions closed with a consensus to redirect them all to the appropriate list article, and I believe that redirecting all of these Woody Woodpecker cartoon articles to Woody Woodpecker filmography is called for here.
For this particular article, I could not find anything more than run of the mill coverage. The book cited here that is available online only shows very brief coverage of this particular cartoon, just a voice credit and nothing else. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion, coverage in THREE books is significant enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Donaldd23: The subject of the article has a less than 1 sentence mention in Who's who in Animated Cartoons, that's it. That hardly counts as sigcov. See here: [3]. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Again, THREE books is significant coverage, in my opinion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:03, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Donaldd23: The subject of the article has a less than 1 sentence mention in Who's who in Animated Cartoons, that's it. That hardly counts as sigcov. See here: [3]. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)