Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Reinhart: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Bob drobbs (talk | contribs) →Melanie Reinhart: How and where is she influential? |
Bob drobbs (talk | contribs) →Melanie Reinhart: Delete |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*'''Keep''', seems to be relatively influential within the world of astrology; the subject matter being fringe doesn't make in-universe influence non-notable. [[User:Rusalkii|Rusalkii]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 02:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''', seems to be relatively influential within the world of astrology; the subject matter being fringe doesn't make in-universe influence non-notable. [[User:Rusalkii|Rusalkii]] ([[User talk:Rusalkii|talk]]) 02:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
*: {{reply to| Rusalkii}} Influential how? Where? Are you finding some sources that I don't see? -- [[User:Bob drobbs|Bob drobbs]] ([[User talk:Bob drobbs|talk]]) 04:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
*: {{reply to| Rusalkii}} Influential how? Where? Are you finding some sources that I don't see? -- [[User:Bob drobbs|Bob drobbs]] ([[User talk:Bob drobbs|talk]]) 04:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': I also could find nothing at all. Seems to fail [[WP:GNG]]. -- [[User:Bob drobbs|Bob drobbs]] ([[User talk:Bob drobbs|talk]]) 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:41, 13 November 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Melanie Reinhart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a WP:FRINGEBLP of a non-notable subject. I can find no reviews of her books in reliable sources for WP:NAUTHOR. I don't think winning the Charles Harvey Award for Exceptional Service to Astrology ([1]) counts for WP:ANYBIO. The best source I could find is [2], but it's a book by astrologers published by an occult publisher. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 02:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Keep, has an authority control template(I actually once saw this as a keep argument) In all seriousness, Delete, just not seeing any reliable non-in universe coverage. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)- Keep, seems to be relatively influential within the world of astrology; the subject matter being fringe doesn't make in-universe influence non-notable. Rusalkii (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Rusalkii: Influential how? Where? Are you finding some sources that I don't see? -- Bob drobbs (talk) 04:39, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: I also could find nothing at all. Seems to fail WP:GNG. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 04:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)