Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Right Livelihood Award: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:15, 23 November 2021

Right Livelihood Award

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization's notability seems to rest on some very brief mentions in a few news sources (e.g. BBC, Deutche World). I note that none of these articles have bylines, and they all seem to read like press-releases. There's no evidence that anybody other than the organisation themselves considers the Right Livelihood award to be an "Alternative Nobel Prize". The vast majority of sources on this article are inappropriate (e.g. YT, primary sources) which do little to establish any notability for this subject. Salimfadhley (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reliable mainstream sources like SVT (the Swedish national televisin broadcasting corporation) also refers to it as the "alternative Nobel Prize". As does national radio. The award ceremony had been in the parliament for thirty years, and it is known well enough that it was news when it had to move, and big, national organisations were involved in the debate. SVT and SR, linked above, are perhaps the two most important and respected news organisations in Sweden, and go beyond just press releases. A seearch in w:sv:Mediearkivet gives plenty of results from all sorts of major Swedish newspapers, over a longer period of time. I'm sure there's a lot that could be done with the article, but the award itself is easily notable. /Julle (talk) 17:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Awards|list of Awards-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sweden|list of Sweden-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 12:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Keep'''. Reliable mainstream sources like [https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/greta-thunberg-tilldelas-det-alternativa-nobelpriset-som-yngst-nagonsin SVT] (the Swedish national televisin broadcasting corporation) also refers to it as the "alternative Nobel Prize". As does [https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/7049751 national radio]. The award ceremony had been in the parliament for thirty years, and it is known well enough that it was news [https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/svt-nyheter-avslojar-alternativa-nobelpriset-portas-fran-riksdagen when it had to move], and [https://www.svt.se/opinion/behall-right-livelihood-priset-i-riksdagen big, national organisations were involved in the debate]. SVT and SR, linked above, are perhaps the two most important and respected news organisations in Sweden, and go beyond just press releases. A seearch in [[w:sv:Mediearkivet]] gives plenty of results from all sorts of major Swedish newspapers, over a longer period of time. I'm sure there's a lot that could be done with the article, but the award itself is easily notable. /[[User:Julle|Julle]] ([[User talk:Julle|talk]]) 17:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)