User talk:Colonestarrice

Barnstar for you!

	Requested move barnstar
	Hi, even though I disagree with the overall outcome as the nominator, I really appreciate how you closed the RM at Talk:Falcon (comics) with a detailed consideration of all viewpoints and rationales. IronManCap (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

@IronManCap: Thank you, this means a lot to me! I attempted to render a decision that would be as fair, comprehensible and all-inclusive as possible. I'm sorry that it had to end this way, and that you had to wait almost 2 month for a closure. I personally would have even preferred your suggested title (I'm not sure if I'm allowed to say that) but the opposers' reasoning had the upper hand in this RM; and I'm intentionally choosing the term "upper hand" instead of "prevailed", as it really was a narrow one. I only regret having closed it as "not moved" instead of "no consensus", since the literal definition of consensus is still "general agreement" and there was clearly no such thing here. Anyways, thanks for your feedback! Colonestarrice (talk) 20:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I am definitely satisfied with how you parsed the discussion, hence the barnstar. I think future discussions may be needed over the guidance at WP:NCCOMICS, not necessarily because the guidelines are failing but rather how to corroborate this guidance in line with general naming conventions and guidelines. For me, "not moved" and "no consensus" have the same weight btw, and I certainly have no issue with the closer "picking a side" if they provide a detailed rationale and evaluation of the discussion. Thanks, IronManCap (talk) 21:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Cool barnstar, I hadn't seen that one before! Just dropping by to say I also liked your close, which was steps above what I typically see from non-admin closers. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:15, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hoax

Hello! Following the deletion of hoax article, could you please restore the article in order to add it to this page. Thanks.--Renvoy (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hey @Renvoy:, I believe you meant to write to User:Geschichte, the deleting administrator. I just supported your nomination and I'm not an admin. Colonestarrice (talk) 12:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, you`re indeed right, sorry--Renvoy (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Colonestarrice (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

My oops

Hi! As you saw I started a new thread in VP:Policy and you linked to an existing discussion over at WT:ANRFC. However, I think the discussion should probably be moved to VP with a collapsed mention of the existing text in WT:ANRFC as I feel the discussion might be better suited to happen in VP:Policy. What is your opinion? Also pinging The Gnome. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 14:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)