Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ksenia Svarovski: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 15:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 15:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)</small> |
||
Dear Mvqr! I have given enough sources about this person in my article. These are very respected international journals, such as [[Marie Claire]] |
Dear Mvqr! I have given enough sources about this person in my article. These are very respected international journals, such as [[Marie Claire]], [[Cosmopolitan]]. Also, very famous Russian newspapers and magazines write about her, such as [[Komsomolskaya Pravda]], Paparazzi, METRO, [[Argumenty i Fakty]], Argumenty Nedeli, [[Izvestia]] and many others. There are 27 sources in total. I am very surprised. Sincerely,[[User:Олег Черкасский|Олег Черкасский]] ([[User talk:Олег Черкасский|talk]]) 17:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
** People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. We can see secondary sources: articles about the person are repeated by other magazines and online publications.[[User:Олег Черкасский|Олег Черкасский]] ([[User talk:Олег Черкасский|talk]]) 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
** People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. We can see secondary sources: articles about the person are repeated by other magazines and online publications.[[User:Олег Черкасский|Олег Черкасский]] ([[User talk:Олег Черкасский|talk]]) 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' These sources are here to just [[WP:REFBOMB|refbomb]]: constantly repeating what she says. Not enough to pass GNG. [[User:Styyx|<span style="color: #126180">'''~Styyx'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Styyx|<span style="color: #24d63f">''Talk?''</span> <span style="color:gray">^-^</span>]]</sup> 19:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' These sources are here to just [[WP:REFBOMB|refbomb]]: constantly repeating what she says. Not enough to pass GNG. [[User:Styyx|<span style="color: #126180">'''~Styyx'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Styyx|<span style="color: #24d63f">''Talk?''</span> <span style="color:gray">^-^</span>]]</sup> 19:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
** Have you checked all the sources for sure? There are sources that repeat because it's interesting, but there are also many unique sources. I just found another one, for example: [https://wall.wayxar.com/innovation/ya_biolog_novye_professii_kotorye_poyavilis_blagodarya_sotsialnym_setyam "I am a biologist": new professions that have appeared thanks to social networks] This is an absolutely unique text![[User:Олег Черкасский|Олег Черкасский]] ([[User talk:Олег Черкасский|talk]]) 21:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:20, 29 November 2021
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ksenia Svarovski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She isn't notable. She founded an online university of sorts for internet marketing. I searched in Russian too, and I don't see sources giving GNG. Mvqr (talk) 15:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Dear Mvqr! I have given enough sources about this person in my article. These are very respected international journals, such as Marie Claire, Cosmopolitan. Also, very famous Russian newspapers and magazines write about her, such as Komsomolskaya Pravda, Paparazzi, METRO, Argumenty i Fakty, Argumenty Nedeli, Izvestia and many others. There are 27 sources in total. I am very surprised. Sincerely,Олег Черкасский (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. We can see secondary sources: articles about the person are repeated by other magazines and online publications.Олег Черкасский (talk) 18:44, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete These sources are here to just refbomb: constantly repeating what she says. Not enough to pass GNG. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:12, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Have you checked all the sources for sure? There are sources that repeat because it's interesting, but there are also many unique sources. I just found another one, for example: "I am a biologist": new professions that have appeared thanks to social networks This is an absolutely unique text!Олег Черкасский (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)