Talk:OS/390: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:33, 30 November 2021

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.

[untitled]

Not sure "basically" inspires confidence and I'm not sure the statement with it is accurate. Martin Packer 17:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restructure of articles about IBM mainframe operating systems

After a big edit of MVS I concluded that the whole set of articles about IBM mainframe operating systems from System/360 onwards needed to be re-structured to minimise overlap and to make clearer the evolutionary relationships between these operating systems (notably in memory management, which is historically a major distinguishing feature). There is already some support for this proposal. Please add comments at Talk: MVS. Philcha 23:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite of Job Control Language in progress

As part of the proposed restructure of articles on IBM mainframe operating systems (above), I've rewritten Job Control Language to: cover IBM's DOS/360 and its descendants as well as OS/360 and its descendants; focus more on the facilities and flavour of the 2 JCLs rather than on details of some statement types and some of their options. Please comment in Talk: Job Control Language. I'd be particulary grateful for more info on DOS/360 and its descendants, especially after 1980 - I only used DOS JCL a handful of times, and only in the late 1970s.

The rewrite does not currently take account of Truthanado's point in Talk: Job Control Language about use of "JCL" by computer suppliers other than IBM, which may entail further restructuring of articles about JCLs. Philcha 00:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are no DFP or DFSMS articles to link to

The article has a DFP link that redirects to HSM, an unrelated component of DFSMS. Either someone should write a DFSMSdfp article or the link should be changed to text. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 19:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Software |class=Stub |importance=}}
+{{FOLDOC}}
 ==[untitled]==