Jump to content

Talk:Ifeoma Ozoma: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:
::Oh, I'm so sorry for misreading the "authored" text! Also, unfortunately the footnote that was recently added is under paywall and from over ten years ago. It could be though that California is an exception here and I'm not aware of it. Just double checking that the correct language is being used so there isn't confusion for others trying to mirror this important work in other states. Are there other supporting references here that speak to a citizen being able to "sponsor" legislation in the same way that legislators do? [[User:Thistechworkertoo|Thistechworkertoo]] ([[User talk:Thistechworkertoo|talk]]) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
::Oh, I'm so sorry for misreading the "authored" text! Also, unfortunately the footnote that was recently added is under paywall and from over ten years ago. It could be though that California is an exception here and I'm not aware of it. Just double checking that the correct language is being used so there isn't confusion for others trying to mirror this important work in other states. Are there other supporting references here that speak to a citizen being able to "sponsor" legislation in the same way that legislators do? [[User:Thistechworkertoo|Thistechworkertoo]] ([[User talk:Thistechworkertoo|talk]]) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
:::That's odd, I'm not hitting a paywall. Regardless, that source in the footnote just explains the terminology that is unusual; the other two sources (''The Hill'' and ''The Verge'', at the end of the sentence) support that Ozoma is a "cosponsor". [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] (she/her • [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|talk]]) 02:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
:::That's odd, I'm not hitting a paywall. Regardless, that source in the footnote just explains the terminology that is unusual; the other two sources (''The Hill'' and ''The Verge'', at the end of the sentence) support that Ozoma is a "cosponsor". [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] (she/her • [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|talk]]) 02:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
::: Reporters don't always understand the legislative process and regurgitate whatever language is told to them or will get the most attention and clicks. I think it's important that we fact check beyond these sources that it's appropriate to state that Silence No More California legislation was sponsored by Ifeoma vs. inspired and informed by her. Either way she obviously had an important and critical role in passing the legislation. [[User:Thistechworkertoo|Thistechworkertoo]] ([[User talk:Thistechworkertoo|talk]]) 02:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
:::: Reporters don't always understand the legislative process and regurgitate whatever language is told to them or will get the most attention and clicks. I think it's important that we fact check beyond these sources that it's appropriate to state that Silence No More California legislation was sponsored by Ifeoma vs. inspired and informed by her. Either way she obviously had an important and critical role in passing the legislation. [[User:Thistechworkertoo|Thistechworkertoo]] ([[User talk:Thistechworkertoo|talk]]) 02:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:19, 2 December 2021

Influence on WA Legislation

One of the sources cited on Cher Scarlett's work on legislative work in Washington state is a profile about Ozoma.[1] I believe it make sense to re-instate that here, given that context.SquareInARoundHole (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Woo, Erin (24 November 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". Retrieved 29 November 2021.

Potential incorrect to use of the language "sponsor" ?

This page mentions as is that Ifeoma "authorized" and "sponsored" Silence No More Legislation. While she was an inspiration and powerful advocate for the legislation, my understanding is that citizens can't sponsor and authorize legislation; those are actions of the legislators who supported the bill. She's not, for example, listed as a "sponsor" of the bill on the bill's official page: https://legiscan.com/CA/sponsors/SB331/2021 Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the footnote? The "sponsor" wording is explained there. It also says she "authored" (not "authorized") the bill. Both descriptors, by the way, are supported in the inline citations. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm so sorry for misreading the "authored" text! Also, unfortunately the footnote that was recently added is under paywall and from over ten years ago. It could be though that California is an exception here and I'm not aware of it. Just double checking that the correct language is being used so there isn't confusion for others trying to mirror this important work in other states. Are there other supporting references here that speak to a citizen being able to "sponsor" legislation in the same way that legislators do? Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's odd, I'm not hitting a paywall. Regardless, that source in the footnote just explains the terminology that is unusual; the other two sources (The Hill and The Verge, at the end of the sentence) support that Ozoma is a "cosponsor". GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Reporters don't always understand the legislative process and regurgitate whatever language is told to them or will get the most attention and clicks. I think it's important that we fact check beyond these sources that it's appropriate to state that Silence No More California legislation was sponsored by Ifeoma vs. inspired and informed by her. Either way she obviously had an important and critical role in passing the legislation. Thistechworkertoo (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]