Jump to content

Shinn v. Ramirez: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:


{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}}

[[Category:Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act case law]]

Revision as of 23:24, 4 December 2021

Shinn v. Ramirez
Argued December 8, 2021
Full case nameDavid Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al. v. David Martinez Ramirez and Barry Lee Jones
Docket no.20-1009
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Laws applied
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996

Carson v. Makin (Docket 20–1009) is a pending United States Supreme Court case related to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.

Background

Many towns in Maine do not have public school districts. The state provides a tuition assistance program for residents of those localities to send their children to private schools, but sectarian schools are excluded. The Institute for Justice represents two families challenging the exclusion of sectarian schools from the program.[1]

Supreme Court

Certiorari was granted in the case on May 17, 2021.

References

  1. ^ Howe, Amy (July 2, 2021). "Justices add one religious-rights case to docket but turn down another". SCOTUSblog. Archived from the original on July 2, 2021. Retrieved July 2, 2021.