User talk:Alexisgordon: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:15, 13 December 2021

This is Alexisgordon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Alexisgordon! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kezia Harrell (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please show how she meets either WP:ARTIST or, more broadly, WP:PERSON. (Either one of these will do.) Also, what we need is commentary by other people on her works.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kezia Harrell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kezia Harrell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alexisgordon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfonso Gonzalez Jr. (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NARTIST. Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alfonso Gonzalez Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alfonso Gonzalez Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 04:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Delfin Finley (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The child of fashion designers and the self-proclaimed intersection between the Westside and South Central, Delfin grew up in a family that encouraged creativity and around incredible street art, like the work of El Mac. I don't understand how an intersection can proclaim anything. Who is it who can't believe the street art? The prose here is overegged, and when I looked to see where this particular, strange assertion came from, I found that it (and much else) came from an interview. What's needed is accounts of Finley's stuff from sources that are independent of Finley. Not from interviews with him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Delfin Finley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Delfin Finley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 02:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sasha Gordon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sasha Gordon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/sasha-gordon-perturbing-paintings-1234595010/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please undo this i am mid edit now all my work seems to be gone?????? I just copied and pasted the stuff in that i wanted to draw on for research and i was almost halfway done and now i can't find it and i'm freaking out because i'm doing this for a class and i need to turn it in asap (due at midnight my time which is 10 min ago). I AM NOT INTENDING ON USING THE STUFF PASTED IN. I DID NOT INTEND TO SUBMIT IT AS IS. PLEASE UNDO WHAT YOU DID SO I CAN RETURN TO WORKING ON IT.

SERIOUSLY I AM FREAKING OUT I DID NOT MEAN TO SUBMIT IT OBVIOUSLY WOULD NOT PLAGIARIZE SOMEONE'S ARTICLE IM NOT AN IDIOT I LITERALLY WAS JUST TRYING TO SAVE MY EDITS SO I COULD KEEP WORKING NOW ALL OF MY WORK IS GONE

It isn't gone. It's still there. Copy it, paste it to your hard drive, edit it, then restart your draft. But hurry! -- Hoary (talk) 05:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, sadly, it appears to be. I noticed I had a new talk message so I went to save my work and clicked on the talk page to read the message. I assume something glitched because when I returned to the page it had switched to source editing and was back to my original pasted in stuff.

I am genuinely so exhausted and my brain feels like mush and it's all gone and I am very (very) sad Alexisgordon (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted on 1 July 2020. (Yes, 2020, not 2021.) It hasn't been deleted since. Take a look again -- and quickly. -- Hoary (talk) 06:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hang on: it "was back to my original pasted in stuff". Yes, that's what there is. If you rewrote it, then you somehow omitted to save ("publish") the result. Really. Nobody has made any deletion. (Or I should say: Nobody had made any, the last time I looked.) -- Hoary (talk) 06:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No I know I can see that it's there. Just sadly as you say whatever I attempted to save was not saved. Thank you for trying to help I really appreciate it just had to whine + mourn for a second before starting overAlexisgordon (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What has happened to you has also happened to me. Actually these days if I'm planning to do something big I generally use geany to create it as a text file on my hard drive. This actually has more risks than doing it in the conventional way (geany lacks an autosave, let alone an edit history), but I'm very much aware of this and the awareness (i.e. dread of screwing up) keeps me alert. Usually. -- Hoary (talk) 07:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexisgordon, Now that you have found your text, maybe you should remove your comments (frankly, screams) at User talk:Idoghor Melody? Also, new comments should always be added at the bottom of the page (the only exception are Welcome messages, one of which I just placed on top of your Talk page). See Talk page guidelines for details. Cheers, — kashmīrī ^TALK 08:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've deleted that page without reading this – just a palimpsest of copyvios, much worse than Earwig seemed to suggest. Alexisgordon, if you activate your email I will mail you your text, on the strict condition that you do not post any part of it in Wikipedia. You could then consult it and write entirely new text in your own words for your assignment based on facts reported in the references. Very brief quotations of non-free text are OK as long as they are clearly marked as quotations (i.e., in quotation marks) and attributed to the source. Your course instructor should have explained our copyright policy to you before anything else. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoary, thank you for this tip. This assignment has definitely given me an appreciation for how complicated/difficult writing a wiki page actually is!!

@Kashmiri, Thank you for the welcome and the tip, and yes, they were screams lol. i appreciate the gentle nudge, I went and apologized (and also saw your comment to him--thank you genuinely for what you said). I can see how people's tempers can flare in this process but I have definitely been surprised to see how quick people are to kind of try to prove they know better than others/how high the stakes seem to be for some? anyway, thanks again Alexisgordon (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]