Jump to content

Talk:Bacău County: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.5)
rating
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Romania|class=
{{WikiProject Romania|class=start}}
}}


==Untitled==
==Untitled==

Revision as of 20:14, 14 December 2021

WikiProject iconRomania Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Untitled

Khoikhoi, I don't think 1% of the population can be called a "large population". :-) bogdan 16:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, what 2002 census is this article reffering to, cause according to the romanian one (see http://www.edrc.ro/recensamant.jsp?regiune_id=1&judet_id=2 and http://nepszamlalas.adatbank.transindex.ro/?pg=9&id=17) csangos and hungarians hardly made up 5.000 in this county, far from the around 10% or 51130 people this article claims Anonimu 20:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I agree with the Romanian contributors, since the reasons for using the Hungarian names summarized at Talk:Harghita/Vote do not apply here (ie. traditional counties of Hungary ~ Romanian counties today, large minority groups, etc.). I don't think that "Bákó megye" would mean anything to anyone, be it a historian or an ethnic Hungarian in Romania. Maybe we should add the Hungarian names of the cities that have one (Iasi - Jászváros, Bacau - Bákó, etc). Vay 21:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll remove it, because it was never part of Hungary. --Khoikhoi 22:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the only county outside

"One characteristic of the county is the presence of an important Hungarian population - the only county outside the Carpathian Arch to have traditional Hungarians." This is not true because there are some villages in Vrancea County, and in there is an important hungarian comunity in Neamţ County, Szabofalva-Săbăoani, where come a hungarian writers too. Szabofalva is the capital of northern csangos!!!!!

Bacău & Bákó

Dear Authors,

I added the Hungarian name of the county (judeţ) after reading many of the ethnic names for different Romanian counties. I think it should be shown because it is referred to as such in the Hungarian media, in Hungary and among the ethinc Hungarians in Romania as well.

Until 1989, most Hungarian names for Geographical subjects in non-Transylvanian Romania were not in use - it was the consequence of the policy of the socialist government in Hungary. Since then, these terms became common. There is a consensus amongst Hungarians, that the correct Hungarian equivalent for 'judeţ Bacău' is 'Bákó megye'.

I couldn't find other ethnic names for the county, but since there are many minorities in Romania, it is possible that others exist, and should be added.

Timur Lenk

This is English Wikipedia Anonimu 16:55, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See for example: Gyula (Romanian: Giula) is a town in Békés county (Romanian: Judeţul Bichiş). It is an English article, too.

So what ? Anonimu 11:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bacău County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]