Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Way (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
HelpingWorld (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* '''Delete''' per nom, not notable per [[WP:GNG]]. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Wee Curry Monster|W]][[Special:contributions/Wee Curry Monster|C]][[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|M]]</span><sub>[[Special:EmailUser/Wee Curry Monster|email]]</sub> 08:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' per nom, not notable per [[WP:GNG]]. <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Wee Curry Monster|W]][[Special:contributions/Wee Curry Monster|C]][[User talk:Wee Curry Monster|M]]</span><sub>[[Special:EmailUser/Wee Curry Monster|email]]</sub> 08:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. Having just one small part in a show does not make you notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Article is poorly formatted and not much reliable sources. [[User:HelpingWorld|HelpingWorld]] ([[User talk:HelpingWorld|talk]]) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Having just one small part in a show does not make you notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Article is poorly formatted and not much reliable sources. [[User:HelpingWorld|HelpingWorld]] ([[User talk:HelpingWorld|talk]]) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': Thanks for your efforts, Mujinga, but considering that [[Ben Way|her brother's page]] is an example of the goal of a Wikipedia article ([[WP:WHYN]]), this fails [[WP:SIGCOV]]. A Google news search does not generate enough information to write a full article about the subject. [[User:Heartmusic678|Heartmusic678]] ([[User talk:Heartmusic678|talk]]) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:31, 15 December 2021
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hermione Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable. Dubious sources JMHamo (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion
sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I've done some work on the article and I think it now shows significant coverage in reliable sources. Mujinga (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- Trivial coverage is not enough to show notability JMHamo (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say the two Megan Rose Dickey articles in Business Insider and the VentureBeat article are trivial mentions. Mujinga (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Appreciate the work being put into it by Mujinga, but I just don't think this person is notable. ~Junedude433(talk) 04:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not notable per WP:GNG. WCMemail 08:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Having just one small part in a show does not make you notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Article is poorly formatted and not much reliable sources. HelpingWorld (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Thanks for your efforts, Mujinga, but considering that her brother's page is an example of the goal of a Wikipedia article (WP:WHYN), this fails WP:SIGCOV. A Google news search does not generate enough information to write a full article about the subject. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)