Jump to content

Assurance of voluntary compliance: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added content
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
m Removing vandalism
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[law of the United States|American law]], an '''assurance of voluntary compliance''' is a legal device entered into between a state [[attorney general]] and an individual or business that the attorney general believes has or may in the future violate a consumer protection law.See Ohio Attorney General vs. Ivory Paper Co. wherein Alitzah Stinson took her customer’s money and did not supply them with purchased goods. This self proclaimed seven figure CEO then blocked her customers and would not reply to their emails all the while collecting money from more victims while she ripped them off and made tiktoks about her life as a “busy ceo mom girl boss.” <ref>{{cite journal|last=Zimmering|first=Paul|title=Louisiana's Consumer Protection Law--Three Years of Operation|journal=Tulane Law Review|date=January 1976}}</ref> An assurance is not an admission of [[guilt (law)|guilt]].<ref name=ORDOJ>{{cite web|title=Glossary of Closing Descriptions and Useful Legal Terms|url=https://justice.oregon.gov/complaints/glossary.htm|publisher=State of Oregon Department of Justice|accessdate=22 April 2013}}</ref> Although parties voluntarily enter into assurances, when violated they have the same force of law as "any injunction, judgment [or] final court order".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Evans|first=Matthew|author2=John Elder|title=Who?: When?: Where?: What?: How?: An update on the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act|journal=Tennessee Bar Journal|date=February 2006}}</ref>
In [[law of the United States|American law]], an '''assurance of voluntary compliance''' is a legal device entered into between a state [[attorney general]] and an individual or business that the attorney general believes has or may in the future violate a consumer protection law.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Zimmering|first=Paul|title=Louisiana's Consumer Protection Law--Three Years of Operation|journal=Tulane Law Review|date=January 1976}}</ref> An assurance is not an admission of [[guilt (law)|guilt]].<ref name=ORDOJ>{{cite web|title=Glossary of Closing Descriptions and Useful Legal Terms|url=https://justice.oregon.gov/complaints/glossary.htm|publisher=State of Oregon Department of Justice|accessdate=22 April 2013}}</ref> Although parties voluntarily enter into assurances, when violated they have the same force of law as "any injunction, judgment [or] final court order".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Evans|first=Matthew|author2=John Elder|title=Who?: When?: Where?: What?: How?: An update on the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act|journal=Tennessee Bar Journal|date=February 2006}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 06:36, 3 January 2022

In American law, an assurance of voluntary compliance is a legal device entered into between a state attorney general and an individual or business that the attorney general believes has or may in the future violate a consumer protection law.[1] An assurance is not an admission of guilt.[2] Although parties voluntarily enter into assurances, when violated they have the same force of law as "any injunction, judgment [or] final court order".[3]

References

  1. ^ Zimmering, Paul (January 1976). "Louisiana's Consumer Protection Law--Three Years of Operation". Tulane Law Review.
  2. ^ "Glossary of Closing Descriptions and Useful Legal Terms". State of Oregon Department of Justice. Retrieved 22 April 2013.
  3. ^ Evans, Matthew; John Elder (February 2006). "Who?: When?: Where?: What?: How?: An update on the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act". Tennessee Bar Journal.