Jump to content

User talk:ZimZalaBim: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:ZimZalaBim/Archive 11) (bot
ThomasBi (talk | contribs)
A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Line 35: Line 35:
[[User:571117dtrj|571117dtrj]] ([[User talk:571117dtrj|talk]]) 22:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
[[User:571117dtrj|571117dtrj]] ([[User talk:571117dtrj|talk]]) 22:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:As I noted in your warning, take your dispute to the article's talk page and discuss with other editors there to see if they agree with your position. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<span style="color:black">Zim</span><b style="color:darkgreen">Zala</b><span style="color:black">Bim</span>]] <sup style="color:black">[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</sup> 23:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
:As I noted in your warning, take your dispute to the article's talk page and discuss with other editors there to see if they agree with your position. --[[User:ZimZalaBim|<span style="color:black">Zim</span><b style="color:darkgreen">Zala</b><span style="color:black">Bim</span>]] <sup style="color:black">[[User talk:ZimZalaBim|talk]]</sup> 23:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png|100px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I hope my edits are acceptable, I think you for your review and feedback. [[User:ThomasBi|ThomasBi]] ([[User talk:ThomasBi|talk]]) 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
|}

Revision as of 23:13, 9 January 2022

You Reverted my edits while i removed non-reliable resources

Hi Zim Zala Bim, You just reverted my edits two times from Nitya Mehra. I am not opposing for first one. For second revert: i removed non-reliable reference. Do you think https://www.bollywoodlife.com/ and in.reuters.com are reliable resources. DFXYME (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on your talk page. --ZimZalaBim talk 18:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did everything I did get undone with no explanation?

Hello, I do not understand why my contributions were undone with practically no debate, no explanation, and a false characterization as vandalism. People who search on google are being led to mass psychogenic illness when they are searching for "mass formation psychosis", and while I'm not trying to "spread" this idea, I am trying to undo what appears to be misinformation. I had to fight what seemed to be an experienced editor on the Robert W. Malone page to get this point across. Can you please explain your actions, because I don't understand why we wouldn't want to direct people to the correct term/idea. Deep State Patriot (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to discuss on that talk page. Creating the redirect for "mass formation psychosis" seems to indeed be spreading misinformation, but that's just my opinion. See what others think there. --ZimZalaBim talk 17:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am definitely not trying to amplify the idea maliciously--I tried to delete it from Malone's page twice--but the other editor insisted. It's definitely a novel term, but an old idea, and there has to be another term for it (Nazism is covered well on Wikipedia it seems, so nobody here is allergic to the idea, but the way this issue is being treated risks making it a needlessly attractive term a la the "streisand effect", and so I think my original idea about just wiping it from Wikipedia completely was the correct one). Deep State Patriot (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your message about One Week

Hello. This is a public computer in a hotel. I suspect the person you intended your message for is long gone. Good luck on catching the vandal. (Do you guys actually catch vandals, or just get rid of the vandalism? Nevermind, I guess I won't be around to read your response! Good luck, though!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.51.145.131 (talk) 16:51, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Janaury 2022

Don't understand how the edit to Rose's actual title was unconstructive, another person pointed out that it should be in her bio? there is really no reason it shouldn't.--BabyBella99 (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That other user is YoungExpert (talk · contribs) who was reverted every time and is partially blocked due to behavior in another article. As I noted, discuss on the talk page to try to build consensus for your position. I'll also take this moment to point out our policy against using multiple accounts, as it might be applicable. --ZimZalaBim talk 20:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia edits

The subjective comments being made regarding articles on the Tosh Lupoi page are false and defamatory and should be removed immediately. I've attempted to do these twice and expect these edits to be taken. The article links can be kept, but the subjective comments are inappropriate and should be removed. Thank you for your help.

571117dtrj (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted in your warning, take your dispute to the article's talk page and discuss with other editors there to see if they agree with your position. --ZimZalaBim talk 23:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I hope my edits are acceptable, I think you for your review and feedback. ThomasBi (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]