User talk:BigBang19

Welcome

Hello, BigBang19, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Punk'd

Hi. Thanks for your interest in the Punk'd article. However, much of the material you keep re-inserting into it is not relevant either to the show, or to the specific sections into which you place them. You also might want to take a closer look at your grammar, syntax, wording and spelling. I've posted some of the specifics on this matter on that article's Talk Page, so if you could check it out and chime in, perhaps we can work this out. Thanks. Nightscream 05:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop insisting on poorly-written additions to this article. If you think that the article is wrong, or needs amending, discuss it on the Talk page — don't just keep making the changes. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I must concur with the previous two users; Wikipedia is a community which works only with co-operation. By all means Be Bold, but please do not revert edits that legitimately improve articles, as this only complicates the process of creating concise and informative articles. Thanks. --^pirate 17:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Rachel Bilson. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to The Rock (entertainer). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Allen Iverson, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Kate Beckinsale, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Carmelo Anthony, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. - Glen ^T _C 10:16, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Threats to "delete" articles (which you have no ability to do) because you disagree with other people's edits are not acceptable. Please learn how to deal with others in a friendly and cooperative way. You've gotten quite a few warnings here on your Talk page, I suggest you heed them. User:Zoe|^(talk) 15:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

3 Revert Rule Warning for Punk'd:

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on a page. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. One more you WILL be blocked - Glen ^T _C 18:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Punk'd was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 23:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Warning

BigBang19, you are really starting to push the limits. Before continuing to edit, I strongly suggest you read the following pages WP:CIVIL and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Continuing to make personal attacks as you did here will lead to blocking. Please, just don't do it. In the past few days, you have received multiple warnings, as documented here on your talk page, and any further warnings will lead to a temporary ban. I really hate to make such threats, but your recent actions, especially the personal attack on Nightstorm are inexcusable. I recognize the hard work and time you have spent on Punk'd, but the suggestions that a number of people have made all seem reasonable. You seem to be against working together as a team to improve the article, but Wikipedia is all about doing exactly that, working together to build a professional encyclopedia. Please take my warning seriously and try to be more open to working together instead of attacking a fellow Wikipedian. Remember, no one owns any articles here on Wikipedia. All 3 of the Wikipedia pages I liked to above are policy, not guidelines, so please act accordingly. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 08:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Punk'd blanking

Why do you keep blanking the page? You have been warned and warned to behave. I keep trying to assume good faith, but you keep blatenly violating Wikipedia policy. Consider this your final warning and please review WP:VAND before continuing to edit. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Listing an article for deletion

You are not listing the article correctly hence nothing will be done; Please follow the instructions here - Glen ^T_C (Stollery) 08:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Fox Broadcasting Company and American Broadcasting Company

Your changes to these articles were determined to be unhelpful, and have been reverted. Considering your history, you may want to take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing properly to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:59, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

==Please Use the Preview Button== I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. Zpb52 06:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

White Houses (song)

1. Please do not create sections that are only a paragraph long. Per Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Structure_of_the_article, "sections and subsections that are very short will make the article look cluttered and inhibit the flow. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading".
2. Please do not use "dramatic" language like "trying to destroy Carlton's career"; it obscures the meaning of what you are trying to say (Kutcher never set out to destroy Carlton's career).
3. Wikipedia is not censored; in other words, please don't write works like "fucking" as "f---ing".
4. Please cite your sources whenever possible. Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 10:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Categories

Please see this before adding any more articles to the category Famous members of MySpace.com. Thanks Naconkantari 03:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Britney Spears and Busta Rhymes?

I'm not sure if you're the one who added this, but Under "Failed Punks", it states, "Spears tried to punk Busta Rhymes in New York City but Kutcher told her to not punk Rhymes." Would you happen to know where and when this happened? If she "tried" to punk Rhymes, and Kutcher stopped her, does this mean he showed up in the middle of the operation to sabotage it? Or does it just mean that Spears intended to punk Rhymes, and decided against doing so because Kutcher asked her not to?

Copy-righted article

You did not make the article, "Hi-Jinks", but you contributed the episodes and the descrition of the episodes were copy right from a website(I believe).Click here to go to the site you took the copy-righted info.Hope you won't/did this do/already.Go to my talk page to reply please.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 18:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Kunisaki

Hi - Thanks for creating the article about the new city in Oita. I noticed you disambiguated it from the former town of the same name by adding "(city)" to the end of the name. In cases like this, I think the usual convention has been to use the plain name for the city and disambiguate the town by adding its district in parentheses, e.g. Kunisaki, Oita (Higashikunisaki). I'll move things around (and fix any double redirects that result) to match this convention, but thought I'd let you know what I was doing and why. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi-Jinks

I re-created a Hi-Jinks article.Thanks for contibuting un-copyrighted articles.Holla back on my talkpage.-- Cute 1 4 u 02:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Anniversaries

Please don't add anniversaries to year pages. Especially such things as Pocket Monsters. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

you're awesome

thanks for your work on pokemon articles Blueaster 00:50, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Minamisouma District.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Minamisouma District.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Kunisaki

I also disambiguate with Kiyosu, Kirishima, and Amakusa in the past year by reverting the existing articles and created an new article for the city with the same name. Also, I also added the word "town" or the district's name after the existing article's name, but not to the new ones. User:BigBang19 3:35 PST January 20, 2007

Is this in reference to my note above? There are several dozen towns disambiguated by adding the district's name (at least a few in Hokkaido). Is the point the disambiguation, or keeping different articles in cases where a town has merged into a city with the same name? Most of the town/village articles are stubs. In cases where a town has merged into a city with the same name and the article was a stub, I've been changing the article to be about the city. Do you think there's any point in keeping stub articles for such towns? I don't have a strong preference either way (although at this point it would be hard to say how many times I've done this - as you may know, I'm working through all the town/village articles making updates per Wikipedia:WikiProject Japan/Gappei). Perhaps we should bring this up at Wikipedia:Japan-related topics notice board and see what others think. -- Rick Block (talk) 15:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Core Cities to change status in the near future

Hi. Could you please explain why you reverted my rewrite into a list? The dates for the two cities are identical so I considered my version to be more efficient in conveying the information. Your "corrected" version is not even grammatical as it now stands:

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Classed as a core city on April 1, 1996 and is [=UNNECESSARY] scheduled to become a Designated City on April 1, 2007.

Unless you can provide some rationale for your change, I will revert it after a day or so. --RJCraig 15:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Cite

Your changes to Celebrity sex tape were reverted. Please reread WP:RS to see why it is inappropriate to cite blogs. --Yamla 14:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)