Talk:Doge of Venice

Untitled

According to John Julius Norwich in his History of Venice, the "first two" Doges of Venice are actually apocryphal, and Paolo was almost certainly in fact the Byzantine Exarch at Ravenna that was assassinated in 727 after 726 when Byzantine possessions in Italy including Venice revolted and chose their own Dux, leaders, (the "Dux" of Venice being Orso Ipato, and the title later changing "Doge" following Venetian dialect).

Furthermore according to Norwich, John the Deacon's fantasy that Paolo was the first Doge has to do with (and he got it from who?), wishful thinking that Venice was born in freedom (which is most certainly not the case, as "Ipato" comes from "Hypatos", meaning Consul, the title which the Byzantine emporer granted Orso.)

Shouldn't we be using the Venetian names without vowel endings, like Leonardo Loredan?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmatisse.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Naming

Why isn't this Doge of Venice singualar? As most page that are not merely lists use the singular. gren グレン 21:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Term of office

Did the Doges rule for life? Fishal 04:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Turns out that they did. Fishal 06:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

"resignation of Doge Francesco Foscari in 1457"

Maybe not quite life after-all.

~ender 2008-04-10 12:33:PM MST

Able to leave the Palace complex?

I was under the impression that the Doge could leave the lagoon, if he was accompanied by two observers. Someone with more time could find it in John Norwich's "History of Venice", which is where I think I read it. Plasticbadge 13:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

It's patently obvious that the Doge could leave (e.g. Enrico Dandolo and Francesco Morosini); this seems to have been confusion from a limitation on his meeting with agents of foreign powers. Kirill Lokshin 15:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, the text in the article was:

He was by law forbidden to leave the city, confined for the rest of his life to the Doge's Palace complex and the connected Basilica di San Marco. (Compare with the podestà of other Italian republics who were confined by their term office).

I'll try to search through my copy of Norwich, but this seems to be, on the surface of it, utter nonsense. (Incidenally, members of the Council of Ten were confined to the palace for the duration of their terms, if I recall correctly.) Kirill Lokshin 15:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I have seen the claim repeated on an information panel on my last visit to the Doge's palace. The simple reason given was something like that the Doge's seal was essential to the witnessing of city business, so they needed to keep him around as a physical transaction validation device. It seems like a lousy job, frankly, one you'd only want to retire into. Perhaps I can talk my wife into a repeat visit "fact checking trip" to verify the exact wording they used.

Inopinatus (talk) 08:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Did someone remove that text from the article? Because I don't see it anymore.

~ender 2008-04-10 12:26:PM MST

Kiril Loshkin, I'm at the beginning of Norwhich's coverage of the 12th century and have yet to see it, though it probably came later. Some of what has been removed is in the List of Doges of Venice article and really should be moved back here. IMHO (talk) 22:22, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow? Such doge Much Venice Very Imperial — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.255.212.207 (talk) 15:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Surveillance?

"the doge was constantly under strict surveillance" I was reading in some fiction that the Capi (and boy there's a lot of questions in that article) were constantly watching him, except for when he was in his bed-chamber, with his wife. Yet, he can conduct business? And/or open mail from non-foreign powers?
I'd like some more details.
~ender 2008-04-10 12:23:PM MST

IPA

The IPA for the pronunciation of "Doge" seems to be incorrect. The correct Italian pronunciation is Italian pronunciation: [ˈdɔːdʒe]. In fact, I'm not sure why this article is using English IPA at all. I have added the the Italian pronunciation to the article, but have left the supposed English pronunciation as well, for now. Tad Lincoln (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Seeing as this is an article on the English Wikipedia I think English IPA should be a given. --87.82.207.195 (talk) 21:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Why the Italian pronunciation? Shouldn't it be based upon Venetian Language? --75.71.117.214 (talk) 07:49, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Still, as far as I know, the correct Italian pronunciation should have the final 'e'. It's very rare that Italian words don't end in a vowel. I'm Venetian, but I'm pretty sure I've never heard it in Italian as it's written here. I'm asking a (Roman) linguist about this, I'll update as soon as I know. - klez — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.45.31.14 (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I found an Italian dictionary (the state TV one) that uses the 'e' at the end of the word. http://www.dizionario.rai.it/poplemma.aspx?lid=64523&r=24441 - klez — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.45.31.14 (talk) 14:51, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

All the English dictionaries give the pronunciation (in UK and American English) as /ˈdoʊdʒ/ or /ˈdoʊʒ/, not /ˈdoʊdʒeɪ/. Is there any source for the latter?74.88.18.227 (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doge of Venice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080112132632/http://www.museiciviciveneziani.it:80/frame.asp?pid=608&z=2&tit=Ducale to http://www.museiciviciveneziani.it/frame.asp?pid=608&z=2&tit=Ducale

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Introductory paragraph doesn't read well and is ambiguous

Could someone with more knowledge of the subject revise this part? I found it confusing. In particular:

Doges of Venice were elected for life by the city-state's aristocracy.

and then:

The title "doge" was the title of the senior-most elected official of Venice and Genoa; both cities were republics and elected doges.

My question would be whether the doge was especially elected to be the doge i.e. in an election specific for that purpose, or whether it was just the senior most official who was already elected.

CryptoCat (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)