Talk:DNA sequencing: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:DNA sequencing/Archive 1) (bot |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 18:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 18:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
||
==Whoa, where's the "layman's terms"?== |
|||
Aww, I was hoping to learn how DNA was sequenced, but I reckon if you are an individual that understands "... initiated at a specific site on the template DNA by using a short oligonucleotide 'primer' complementary to the template at that region.", then you probably already know how DNA is sequenced. Common, there's got to be someone out there that is talented enough with words and biology to make this topic accessible to anyone who tries. :) -Tom |
|||
:I'll come back later and give it a try. I'll leave a note here so I'll remember to come back.[[User:Nbauman|Nbauman]] 19:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
This is quandry. Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia it should be written for senior in high school level. But a senior should know what the four common DNA nucleotides are, that DNA has polarity, what a primer is, and that a primer annealing to a complementary strand could be used to initiate polymerization. But as I write this I can understand. To a molecular biologist DNA sequencing is as straight forward as it gets. To try to explain DNA sequencing and having to explain it all the way down to the basics of DNA polarity is a mind boggling task. |
|||
As a 3rd year molecular biology student at a rather prestigious research university I think I can say that DNA sequencing is not "as straight forward as it gets". This page could really use a diagram like the one on the [[PCR]] page. Sure, one might be well off to brush up on [[DNA Replication]] and [[PAGE]] before trying to tackle the intricacies of sequencing, but it might not hurt for the page to be a little clearer on why knowing the length of various segments tells one anything about which nucleotide goes where. As those in the know, we have a responsibility to share our knowledge with others, and I really think that its attitudes like this that have led whatever majority of americans to believe that the world was created in 6 days. So lets be helpful, if only for our own sake [[User:ArmyOfFluoride|ArmyOfFluoride]] ([[User talk:ArmyOfFluoride|talk]]) 05:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
No such thing as DNA or not, doesn't matter. Be/can be any no matter what and any can be perfect. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:VunslK|VunslK]] ([[User talk:VunslK#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/VunslK|contribs]]) 07:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM. == |
== THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM. == |
||
If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same. |
If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same. |
||
== I feel like most methods under 'Methods in development' are included in the definition High-throughput methods == |
|||
I propose to make Methods in dev under High-throughput methods for more clarity.[[User:Walidou47|Walidou47]] ([[User talk:Walidou47|talk]]) 13:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC) |
|||
== addition of new result by the NIH july 2020 == |
== addition of new result by the NIH july 2020 == |
||
Revision as of 04:03, 18 January 2022
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| Template:WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology
Template:WikiProject Computational Biology Template:WikiProject Genetics
| |||||||||||
 | DNA sequencing received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 360 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 May 2020 and 22 June 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Cstaheli.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2021 and 4 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shady2021.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Krusec. Peer reviewers: Krusec.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
THE REPLICATION AND DETERMINATION OF DNA IN ITS RAW FORM.
If this is possible that a DNA strand can be copied by tRNA mRNA and create a polypeptide sequence, and we know we can replicate it. over the years I have studied this subject and heard the some where someone is mapping the dna sequence of a human being as the dna is all similar obviously not the same or we would all be carbon copies of each other like the bits that make us tall short different eye colour ect. then why do we insist on hacking people open and mending holes in hearts etc if a sample of tissue can be replicated and grown on a mouse back for example how long will it be that it is a simple thing called copy and paste we use it all the time in computers copy the affected area and past a new bit back in this can be put in the form of an injection or hyper spray and as scar tissue is formed over an area of a wound it’s the body’s way of compensating for the loss of information to that area why can’t we do the same.
addition of new result by the NIH july 2020
Researchers have for the first time eve been able to sequence an entire human chromosome the x chromosome.
as some of you may know the human genome project never atually mapped the whole human genome so this result is quite important and exiting
im asking if this result can be added to the article and whare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)