Jump to content

User talk:DullRoar: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DullRoar (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 90: Line 90:
:# {{cite web |last1=Auteri |first1=Steph |title=Educate & Activate: Cultural Appropriation |url=https://www.feministbookclub.com/educate-activate-cultural-appropriation/ |website=Feminist Book Club |access-date=19 January 2022 |date=6 June 2020}}
:# {{cite web |last1=Auteri |first1=Steph |title=Educate & Activate: Cultural Appropriation |url=https://www.feministbookclub.com/educate-activate-cultural-appropriation/ |website=Feminist Book Club |access-date=19 January 2022 |date=6 June 2020}}
:{{pb}}Your source #1 is primary and self-serving. And, source #2 is [[WP:BLOG]] of some random book club. Both of them cannot be used for the claim that {{tq| concept had been described earlier, notably by Arthur E. Christy in 1945}}. You said book club's blog is a {{tq|peer-reviewed}}; I fear you don't understand what a "peer-reviewed academic journal" means. Again, please have a look at the suggested Wiki policies; that'd help you grasp.{{pb}}Do not come to my talk page regarding this again. Your talk page edits will be reverted. [[User:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;color:#292928;">WikiLinuz</span>]]<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:15px;margin:0px 6px 0px 4px">🍁</span>([[User_talk:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;">talk</span>]]) 01:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{pb}}Your source #1 is primary and self-serving. And, source #2 is [[WP:BLOG]] of some random book club. Both of them cannot be used for the claim that {{tq| concept had been described earlier, notably by Arthur E. Christy in 1945}}. You said book club's blog is a {{tq|peer-reviewed}}; I fear you don't understand what a "peer-reviewed academic journal" means. Again, please have a look at the suggested Wiki policies; that'd help you grasp.{{pb}}Do not come to my talk page regarding this again. Your talk page edits will be reverted. [[User:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;color:#292928;">WikiLinuz</span>]]<span style="color:transparent;text-shadow:0 0 0 red;font-size:15px;margin:0px 6px 0px 4px">🍁</span>([[User_talk:WikiLinuz|<span style="font-family:Optima;">talk</span>]]) 01:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

No, you misunderstand. The ORIGINAL article is scholarly work, not the book club.

The original article is not "self-serving;" it is the very piece of research I am trying to include! How is that "self-serving?"

Please do not carry on this edit war. I believe I am allowed to tag your user talk page correspondingly if you do.

[[User:DullRoar|DullRoar]] ([[User talk:DullRoar#top|talk]]) 01:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:55, 19 January 2022

Welcome

Hello, DullRoar, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lklundin (talk) 09:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

January 2022

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Cultural appropriation, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 14:39, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You cited a WP:BLOG "feministbookclub.com", which isn't a reliable source. We use high-quality peer-reviewed academic sources for such claims. See WP:SCHOLARSHIP. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sources you included on your diff on 19:59, 18 Jan. 2022:
  1. Christy, Arthur E. (1945). The Asian Legacy and American Life. New York: John Day. p. 39.
  2. Auteri, Steph (6 June 2020). "Educate & Activate: Cultural Appropriation". Feminist Book Club. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
Your source #1 is primary and self-serving. And, source #2 is WP:BLOG of some random book club. Both of them cannot be used for the claim that concept had been described earlier, notably by Arthur E. Christy in 1945. You said book club's blog is a peer-reviewed; I fear you don't understand what a "peer-reviewed academic journal" means. Again, please have a look at the suggested Wiki policies; that'd help you grasp.
Do not come to my talk page regarding this again. Your talk page edits will be reverted. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 01:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you misunderstand. The ORIGINAL article is scholarly work, not the book club.

The original article is not "self-serving;" it is the very piece of research I am trying to include! How is that "self-serving?"

Please do not carry on this edit war. I believe I am allowed to tag your user talk page correspondingly if you do.

DullRoar (talk) 01:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]