Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- |
---- |
||
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
<!-- Insert new nominations below this line --> |
||
⚫ | |||
==== RD: Rafael Nadal ==== |
==== RD: Rafael Nadal ==== |
||
⚫ | |||
| article = Rafael Nadal<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
| article = Rafael Nadal<!-- Do not wikilink --> |
||
| blurb = Rafael Nadal wins historic 21st Grand Slam title at the 2022 Australian Open.<!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
| blurb = Rafael Nadal wins historic 21st Grand Slam title at the 2022 Australian Open.<!-- Add your suggestion of the blurb; should be written in simple present tense. --> |
Revision as of 14:59, 30 January 2022
Welcome to In the news. Please read the guidelines. Admin instructions are here. |
In the news toolbox |
---|
This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.
This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.
view — page history — related changes — edit |
Glossary
All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality. Nomination steps
The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.
Headers
Voicing an opinion on an itemFormat your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated. Please do...
Please do not...
Suggesting updatesThere are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:
|
Archives
January 30
January 30, 2022
(Sunday)
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
RD: Rafael Nadal
Blurb: Rafael Nadal wins historic 21st Grand Slam title at the 2022 Australian Open. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.usnews.com/news/sports/articles/2022-01-30/nadal-wins-australian-open-for-record-21st-major-title
Credits:
- Nominated by Interstellarity (talk · give credit)
- Created by RayDansh (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Record broken with international significance. RayDansh (talk) 14:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Jo Kendall
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Metro, Beyond the Joke
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Rigg (talk · give credit), Philip Cross (talk · give credit), C. J. Greengrass (talk · give credit) and Lugnuts (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: One of the few women in that generation of British comedy, her "John and Mary" sketches with Cleese would always crack me up. There don't seem to be any mainstream obituaries yet but I expect that the BBC will wake up soon. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Work needed on referencing. Pawnkingthree (talk) 14:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
January 29
January 29, 2022
(Saturday)
Armed conflicts and attacks Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Sports
|
(Posted) RD: Ralph Mellanby
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Toronto Sun, TSN
Credits:
- Nominated by Joofjoof (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Normantas Bataitis (talk · give credit) and Jkaharper (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Executive producer of Hockey Night in Canada (1966–85). Joofjoof (talk) 00:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Adequate article, somewhat big name. InedibleHulk (talk) 08:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good to go.BabbaQ (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) January 2022 North American blizzard
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A blizzard impacts the Northeastern United States leaving thousands without power. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/29/weather/noreaster-bomb-cyclone-storm-saturday/index.html
Credits:
- Nominated by Interstellarity (talk · give credit)
- All storms are disruptive; we usually wait until an estimate of damage and casualty figures are known. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Barring any serious death toll, it is the middle of winter, blizzard in the NE are common place and losing power during them is a first-world problem. --Masem (t) 21:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The article has not been updated sufficiently; it is mostly written in anticipation of the storm. Also I got a few inches of snow but didn't lose power, so not much of an impact. Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose for now Here we go again...Can't anyone take a look at what positions there are around here on nominations related to natural disasters before nominating them? If a storm doesn't cause a substantial number of fatalities, it's not ITN-worthy no matter where it happens. And no matter how many thousands don't have electricity...it's a blizzard and these things happen. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose More people died in a storm in the UK today. A different storm in the UK earlier this season cut the power to Scotland and northern England for days. Even the UK and they're not being nominated. Because winter storms be winter storms. Kingsif (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Blowing & snowing. Glad I'm not there. [1] [2] – Sca (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Once the blowing stops, fresh driven snow can be alright, even quite alright indeed. See that guy on the skis? He regrets nothing! InedibleHulk (talk) 07:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wait Article quality is not good enough to post. When we get more updates on damages, casualties, etc., and the article is updated appropriately, I'll reassess. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wait per Muboshgu but leaning oppose. This will have to turn into something a lot bigger than it is currently looking for me to support. Winter storms happen in winter. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not particularly notable as far as winter storms goes. DarkSide830 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – Quite the storm all right, with much photo & vid coverage, but now it's down to staying warm and digging out. Unaware of any reported fatalities yet. [3] [4] [5] – Sca (talk) 13:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) Tom Brady retirement
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: National Football League quarterback Tom Brady announces his retirement after 22 seasons. (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:
- Nominated by 331dot (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
- Support - I'm aware this nomination thread will become a calamity due to it being a U.S.-centric item and the NFL to boot. But there are few sportsmen who can legitimately place themselves in the ranks of "greatest of all time", no matter what the sport, unlike Tom Brady.--WaltCip-(talk) 20:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strong oppose At least with Ferguson and Tendulkar, we're talking international sport and play, so there's a bar of comparison across the globe. With gridiron football, its very limited, and many will argue if Brady is the best of all time there (compared to others like Joe Montana, etc.). --
Masem (t) 20:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- There's no longer any real comparison between Brady and Montana or any other QB. Montana was the most important player on 4 Super Bowl-winning teams. Brady was the most important player on 7, with 3 other teams that went to the Super Bowl. Brady essentially had a second Hall of Fame career after the age of 38 when Montana retired. It could be argued that Montana faced more restrictive rules and defenses than Brady did, but Brady also accomplished his 7 titles in a league with a salary cap, free agency, and more overall parity than Montana dealt with. There really isn't any serious argument against Brady being the best ever to play the game. 65.24.244.191 (talk) 23:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Gridiron football is played internationally. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Nowhere close to the levels of cricket or association football. --Masem (t) 20:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Masem. I can't wait to see the retirement of the best player in the history of petanque nominated. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per WaltCip. It's certainly in the news, even internationally. -- Tavix (talk) 20:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Where is there international coverage? HiLo48 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Right now, while not the top story on any, it's on the front page of skysports.com, L'Equipe, and La Gazzetta dello Sport. 65.24.244.191 (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Where is there international coverage? HiLo48 (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- To add, this is not confirmed. Eg [6]; all the sources are reported on "inside reports". --Masem (t) 20:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strongest possible oppose No retirements of sports players in sports that are not genuinely international Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Please do not oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." 331dot (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- I was referring to the lack of competition in the sport and therefore the lack of justification for posting a retirement, but thanks for admitting that this is a one-country sport. Your extreme parochialism is well-known Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bumbubookworm What exactly does that mean? I make great effort to set aside my personal biases and support nominations irrespective of where they are from. Who exactly am I "well known" among? I take offense at your comment. 331dot (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- If the level of competition is so high in cricket then why is the best player a batsman 67% better than anyone else? That doesn't usually happen in the most competitive sports. Why is it that some from countries of parochial population and acreage think sub-international always means "lack of competition"? It's the most popular sport in a country of a third of a billion people and $22 trillion GDP (almost as big as the Eurozone). The country is also the size of Europe. While full UN members can of course be the population and GDP of a small town, some are. Borders are just an accident of history. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- I was referring to the lack of competition in the sport and therefore the lack of justification for posting a retirement, but thanks for admitting that this is a one-country sport. Your extreme parochialism is well-known Bumbubookworm (talk) 21:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Please do not oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." 331dot (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - A sports player retiring, even one as good as Brady, doesn't seem to meet the bar of global notability to me. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- But ITN doesn't have a global notability bar. Pawnkingthree (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Leaning oppose. Old man retires. Maybe we should add a "Recent retirements" next to the "Recent deaths" line. BD2412 T 21:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support We have occasionally done retirements and a sportsperson of Brady's stature is one of those rare cases. Pawnkingthree (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose respectfully. We do not do retirements. Nor should we. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ad Orientem That is demonstratably not correct, that we "do not do retirements". We have, and do. They are rare- and should be- but if retiring after winning seven Super Bowls over a 22 year career(Brady was the last active player drafted in 2000) doesn't merit posting, what does? 331dot (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - (edit conflict) I've
neveronly commented here once before :P, but it seems that the discussion is for Brady's retirement would be ITN, not how great he was. He is good enough to be news worthy on this point. Just my 2¢ - FlightTime (open channel) 21:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC) - Oppose An official decision has not been made yet, at least per this report. Support if/when official and article updated. SpencerT•C 22:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - At this stage. Unless someone can convince me that we would EVER post the retirement of an Australian rules football player. HiLo48 (talk) 22:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- And why in hell wouldn't we, if they were qualified enough? WaltCip-(talk) 00:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- If they get in American football with 13 times the fans should get in. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure what you're getting at there. HiLo48 (talk) 03:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- If they get in American football with 13 times the fans should get in. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- And why in hell wouldn't we, if they were qualified enough? WaltCip-(talk) 00:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. The opposition to the inclusion of sporting news in ITN is rather bizarre; it's definitely in the news, and I don't see why sports are any less newsworthy than other sorts of news. The event would clearly be newsworthy and the article on Brady is good. I'm opposing because Brady hasn't actually announced his retirement, per USA Today <https://touchdownwire.usatoday.com/lists/tom-brady-retiring-adam-schefter-report/> and the Associated Press <https://chicago.suntimes.com/2022/1/29/22908080/tom-brady-retirement>. The frequent denials of the ESPN reporting seem to be indicative that this is premature. However, I would strongly support this when Brady actually announces his retirement (whether it be this year or next). — Mhawk10 (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- TROUTS for every supporter per Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports/Handling sports transactions. We wait for official announcements and Brady's people have pushed back on this.[7][8] – Muboshgu (talk) 23:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Don't be a jerk. The sources that initially reported he was retiring was reliable. Even reliable sources can make mistakes. WaltCip-(talk) 00:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- WaltCip, have you ever read Template:Trout?
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.
And no, it was not reliable reporting, otherwise it would have been accurate. This ESPN piece that I'm surprised is still up sayssources say
andsources told ESPN
. As discussed in the essay I linked, that's not corroboration. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- WaltCip, have you ever read Template:Trout?
- Don't be a jerk. The sources that initially reported he was retiring was reliable. Even reliable sources can make mistakes. WaltCip-(talk) 00:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per WP:SACHINTENDULKAR --LaserLegs (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) Sergio Mattarella re-elected President of Italy
Blurb: Sergio Mattarella is elected President of Italy for a second term (Post)
News source(s): BBC Corriere della Sera
Credits:
- Nominated by Yakme (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Nick.mon (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Election of a head of state. Also, the re-election of an Italian president is considered to be an exceptional event in Italian politics. Yakme (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose this is a ceremonial post Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- So is every European monarch Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support News of international relevance, reported on front pages of all newspapers and website.--Holapaco77 (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support as election results were often posted in ITN. As Yakme pointed out, Mattarella got re-elected, with only Giorgio Napolitano achieving that feat before him, so it's quite an exceptional event. Also, this is of relevance both national and international, as Italy is a major power in Europe, but currently is in a political crisis. Therefore, the President, although in a mainly ceremonial role, has a lot of influence in serving as a mediator of unity in a politically divided country/society. - CDE34RFV (talk) 21:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, interesting. Thanks for adding context. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per CDE34RFV. Re-election is rare in Italy, with the seven-year term usually being a lifetime achievement award for the most experienced judges and politicians. It is even more unusual as Mattarella was counting himself out until a few hours ago. Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. I'm not opposing this but it seems less significant to me because the President of Italy is not chosen by popular vote, but from a meeting of parliament and regional officials. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Something similar is true of the U.S. President, because of our jury-rigged political system. (The statement "The POTUS is not chosen by popular vote" is strictly true.) Of course, POTUS is both head of state and head of government. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Point taken, although the US President is chosen by people specifically selected for that purpose and are bound by popular vote to choose a particular candidate; the US President is not chosen by Congress and state governors. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Something similar is true of the U.S. President, because of our jury-rigged political system. (The statement "The POTUS is not chosen by popular vote" is strictly true.) Of course, POTUS is both head of state and head of government. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support. A country electing its head of state is noteworthy enough for this. The President has real power over the Italian armed forces and is not purely ceremonial. — Mhawk10 (talk) 22:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- If it is "exceptional", sounds good to me. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 23:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support As much RS coverage has remarked, the President of Italy is far more than just ceremonial in practice, particularly with the current state of Italian politics. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 03:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose powerless figurehead, elected by representatives from the national assembly not a popular vote. Utterly irrelevant. The Prime Minister of Italy wields actual authority. A country electing its "head of state" is not especailly noteworthy when that title is honorific and I don't understand how that argument keeps surfacing. If WP:ITNC is not a simple !vote count, there is no reason for this to be posted. --LaserLegs (talk) 03:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posting. As indicated above, in this case, the president is not purely ceremonial, and the article is extensive. --Tone 07:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Role is largely ceremonial, even if it does have a few vestigial powers. Doesn't reach reach the threshold for ITN/R, and could open the floodgates for two postings per country in other cases too, which would be excessive. — Amakuru (talk) 07:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- As a side note, the nomination has not been treated as ITNR, but as a regular nomination that saw sufficient support to post. --Tone 10:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
January 28
January 28, 2022
(Friday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
International relations
|
RD: Diego Verdaguer
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Billboard BBC
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Mexican-Argentinian singer, multiple Latin Grammy nominee; over 20 million records sold according to BBC. Article needs a lot of attention. --2806:109F:1:16E1:CC73:D5BD:447B:57C5 (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – A 98-word stub plus unreferenced discography. – Sca (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Sca - FlightTime (open channel) 08:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
January 27
January 27, 2022
(Thursday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Gene Clines
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Muboshgu (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
– Muboshgu (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Meets minimum standards for depth of coverage; fully referened. SpencerT•C 05:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 07:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Georg Christoph Biller
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): MDR
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: German choral conductor, Thomaskantor. Grimes2 (talk) 11:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- I created the article for the 16th person in the position after Bach in 2010. Some refs were missing, dead or unreliable, but Grimes2 did a great job, including adding content. We recently added the article for the 18th successor. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- A little short but still long enough (>400 words), formatting looks fine and there are enough footnotes across the prose, this wikibio is READY for RD. AGF'd all non-English sources. --PFHLai (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Johan Hultin
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Thriley (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Dr Bowser (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Swedish American pathologist. Discovered tissues containing traces of the 1918 influenza virus from graves in Alaskan permafrost. Thriley (talk) 07:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Article looks ready to me, seems to adequately cover what he was notable for. SpencerT•C 04:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 14:06, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Charanjit Singh
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indian Express
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by To be updated. (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian hockey captain. Article is currently a stub and needs to be expanded. Ktin (talk) 05:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Barry Cryer
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
- Updated by Rodericksilly (talk · give credit) and Martinevans123 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Comedy performer and writer whose career spanned decades and a range of comedy styles. The article needs some updating - a little thin in content, and much under-referenced. 2A00:23C7:2B86:9800:E5F5:136:21C0:A3AB (talk) 10:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support agree with nominator that the article needs some work though, especially his later work. jonas (talk) 21:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Have added more sources. A comedy genius. But then don't trust me. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support purely on good faith in my more clever comedy associate here with the dryer British knowhow. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Or did you mean your dire British, etc.? – Sca (talk) 13:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- "Elps ta keep ya sensa yuma, dunnit." Martinevans123 (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
January 26
January 26, 2022
(Wednesday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Health and environment
International relations
Law and crime
|
RD: Jeremiah Stamler
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Chicago Sun Times
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by To be updated (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American cardiologist. Article requires work. Not too far away. Ktin (talk) 05:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Tropical Storm Ana
Blurb: Tropical Storm Ana kills 77 people across Madagascar, Mozambique and Malawi. (Post)
News source(s): (The Guardian)
Credits:
- Nominated by Elijahandskip (talk · give credit)
Nominator's comments: Large death toll from a tropical storm. Mentioned in 2022’s timeline and Weather of 2022. Easily ITN worthy. Elijahandskip (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality (support on notability tho) – Article needs at least some expansion over the two sentences in the lead and impact section at present. Met hist is also incomplete. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 00:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support due the large death toll, Oppose on quality the article need expansion as per Cyclonebiskit. HurricaneEdgar 05:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality as needs expansion. If expanded, then consider this a support- looks more than important enough for ITN. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Thin, undersourced. – Sca (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Like others, there is only one sentence about the impact. Would support this if expanded to give a more complete picture of the impact of the storm. --Jayron32 18:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support on notability, oppose on quality. Per Cyclonebiskit. Nyanardsan (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
January 25
January 25, 2022
(Tuesday)
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
|
RD: Jean-Claude Corbeil
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Montreal Gazette / Canadian Press; Le Devoir (in French); Le Journal de Québec / Agence QMI (in French)
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Long enough (400+ words), formatting looks fine, and there are enough footnotes across the prose, this wikibio is READY for RD. AGF'd the non-English sources. --PFHLai (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Looks fine. Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Peter Robbins
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): FOX 5 San Diego
Credits:
- Nominated by FlyingAce (talk · give credit)
- Updated by 2601:447:4000:220:616b:2f94:49d2:7a23 (talk · give credit), Cocoruff (talk · give credit) and Gianluigi02 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Voice actor for Charlie Brown in the early Peanuts TV specials and the first movie. Death announced yesterday. Article is comprehensive and well referenced. –FlyingAce✈hello 17:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Seems well sourced and it is getting a lot of media attention. Jtnav04 (talk) 19:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Well sourced. An editor has recently added a statement at the end about Robbins not having married or had children. This may need to be sourced or removed before posting to RD, but it seems good to go once that is dealt with. GaryColemanFan (talk) 03:49, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Filmography and Awards lack any references. Stephen 04:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Two whole sections are tagged for lacking references. That needs to be fixed before I can support posting this to the main page. --Jayron32 18:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Milena Salvini
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Business Standard
Credits:
- Nominated by Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · give credit)
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Winner of India's fourth highest civilian award the Padma Shri Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – A bit thin at 220 words of text. – Sca (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Entire decades of her biography are missing from the text. We have about 1 sentence of information from 1962, 1975, 1980, 1999, and 2001. That's MASSIVELY incomplete for a person notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Someone needs to expand this with solid references before it is ready for the main page. --Jayron32 18:28, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Ozzie
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:
- Nominated by TJMSmith (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: African-born western lowland gorilla who resided at the Zoo Atlanta from 1988 until his death. TJMSmith (talk) 14:49, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Might that be "the world's oldest living male gorilla in captivity"? – 17:26, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- I think that is likely true. I stuck to how the sources stated it. TJMSmith (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Old gorilla di...I mean, referencing looks good. GaryColemanFan (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oh sweet Jesus, you had me worried about the other one for a minute there. Anyways, Support; good referencing and nice article. Fakescientist8000 (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 03:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Stephen or another admin: could we change the link from Ozzie to Ozzie (gorilla)? Right now, it's an WP:EASTEREGG, and when people see Ozzie, they're much more likely to assume Ozzy Osbourne (even though the spelling is different). Joseph2302 (talk) 09:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- But we would never just put Ozzy on its own? Stephen 10:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Aye, Ozzy Osbourne has a surname to set him apart. This is Ozzie, the mononym. Don't treat him like a freak just because he wasn't human, I advise. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- In practice, we've almost never added disambigutors to RD displays, though there's occasional rumblings about doing so for non-primary topics.—Bagumba (talk) 07:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Erwin Eisch
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BR
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Grimes2 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: artist in glass from Bavaria who used the material as a means of expression, internationally known - the article was written long ago by a user who left in 2011, many offline sources, the latest refs support the content but many details need to be be believed Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support I've added some ISBN and OCLC. Article ok. Grimes2 (talk) 11:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted to RD. SpencerT•C 22:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Wim Jansen
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Herald Scotland
Credits:
- Nominated by 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:2870:1B66:F076:7A1C (talk · give credit)
- Updated by 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:AC0D:AEB:53CB:48D1 (talk · give credit) and 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:89BC:7719:A491:69DB (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Member of the great Dutch football team of the 1970s, later won the Scottish league in his one season as manager of Celtic. I've painstakingly sourced this through English, Dutch and French sources. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:2870:1B66:F076:7A1C (talk) 15:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support No issues.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 17:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support article looks good. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 19:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Question: Is the table of Club statistics complete? Looks a bit too empty. There should be some figures on each row in the totals column, no? --PFHLai (talk) 01:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Verifying that it is the total is hard to do as there seems to be little in recording appearances in the KNVB Cup. This website [9] shades its cells in red where the data is incomplete, which is every season except his very last one. Even this Dutch website doesn't track KNVB Cup stats on Jansen at all [10] I don't know if this is a blow against posting the recent death. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:AC0D:AEB:53CB:48D1 (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I see that new numbers have been added to the table. --PFHLai (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Verifying that it is the total is hard to do as there seems to be little in recording appearances in the KNVB Cup. This website [9] shades its cells in red where the data is incomplete, which is every season except his very last one. Even this Dutch website doesn't track KNVB Cup stats on Jansen at all [10] I don't know if this is a blow against posting the recent death. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:AC0D:AEB:53CB:48D1 (talk) 16:53, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
- Nominated by 50.67.13.101 (talk · give credit)
- comment/oppose do we really want Wikipedia to be associated with supporting these violent d*mbasses? 5.44.170.26 (talk) 08:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please name call elsewhere, and keep this civil, thank you. Which of these protests were violent? 331dot (talk) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- You seem to be describing a single event, not an ongoing event. 331dot (talk) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Technically, we already have the covid pandemic ongoing since early 2020. So the main link covers all topics, including vaccines and protests. --Tone 08:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- There have been lots of protests across Europe recently. The latest and biggest seems to have been in Brussels for which we do have an article: 2022 Brussels protest. The other protests are perhaps covered in one of the many other articles in category:Protests over responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our Ongoing link does cover this briefly, along with all the other pandemic details – see COVID-19_pandemic#Protests_against_governmental_measures. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
January 24
January 24, 2022
(Monday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science and technology
|
(Ready) RD: John Arrillaga
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Bloomberg (US)
Credits:
- Nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Edwardx (talk · give credit), MelanieN (talk · give credit), Bagumba (talk · give credit) and Pachu Kannan (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American developer. Article needs to be updated. Edits done. Article is a good C-class biography for the homepage / RD. Ktin (talk) 05:35, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Marc Andreessen's father-in-law. Source has been added for death, but the section on his career needs expansion. Joofjoof (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Not a stub, but "Career" is too sparse.—Bagumba (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments @Joofjoof and Bagumba: - have made a few edits. Please have a look at your convenience. I believe it meets hygiene expectations for homepage / RD. Ktin (talk) 08:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Long enough (>600 words), with enough footnotes in expected spots, and formatting looks fine, this wikibio is READY for RD to me. Does Joofjoof or Bagumba want another look? The career section has been slightly expanded in recent edits. --PFHLai (talk) 12:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- The career coverage is better now. Joofjoof (talk) 13:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Looks good to go now.BabbaQ (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) Heidelberg University shooting
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: A gunman shoots four people, one fatally, in Germany's Heidelberg University. (Post)
News source(s): BBC France24 CNN Deutsche Welle Times of Israel The Guardian sueddeutsche.de Associated Press Der Spiegel
Credits:
- Nominated by Dunutubble (talk · give credit)
- Created by Edwardx (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Jim Michael (talk · give credit), Bogger (talk · give credit), Bestof2022 (talk · give credit), Love of Corey (talk · give credit) and Gogolplex (talk · give credit)
- Please note that WP:ITN is separate from Portal:Current events. Your nomination is correct for a nomination to ITN but if it's your intention to have an item added to the current events portal, you should go there. For what it's worth, it looks like this event is already listed on Portal:Current events/2022 January 24. WaltCip-(talk) 14:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the low death toll & because it wasn't motivated by an ideology. However, it's easily notable enough to justify its article & its place on CE. There have been other killings this month which have much higher death tolls & haven't been nominated, let alone posted (although I realise that's because the articles are too short), including Arauca, Dankade, Diyala & Sorong. Jim Michael (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – "An 18-year-old biology student" who killed himself. Lacks general significance. – Sca (talk) 15:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- He killed one of his victims as well. Jim Michael (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- But evidently not for terroristic reasons. Just another disturbed individual. – Sca (talk) 16:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- He killed one of his victims as well. Jim Michael (talk) 15:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose, Sad, but not a significant incident or ideologically motivated. Alex-h (talk) 17:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) James Webb Telescope
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: The James Webb Space Telescope reaches its target orbit at the Earth-Sun L2 Lagrange point. (Post)
News source(s): NYTimes
Credits:
- Nominated by Masem (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
- It's a spacecraft and it has arrived at its destination, I don't see why it shouldn't be posted now, or why it can't be posted when we get images. Too many postings is not our problem, usually. 331dot (talk) 08:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'd prefer posting once it starts collecting data but I don't oppose posting once more at this point, always good to have science stories on ITN. And the telescope is one of the biggest recent science stories. --Tone 09:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wait This craft doesn't really have a destination as it's designed to keep moving. The complex unfurling and alignment is the real challenge and that's not complete yet. Better to wait until it's operational when we will presumably have its first image to show. See Timeline of the James Webb Space Telescope. Andrew🐉(talk) 09:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- That is incorrect; its destination is the L2 point. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- No, they don't want it to go to that point because it would then be in shadow and its solar panels wouldn't work. And there's literally nothing there. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- That is incorrect; its destination is the L2 point. 331dot (talk) 11:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- It would be a permanent ring eclipse so the solar panels would work a little. Entering the quasi-orbit around L2 would be kind of a destination. Complex distant stuff tug-of-war causing quasi-orbits of nothing is pretty cool, L4 and L5 asteroids even need the Coriolis effect to orbit! Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Andrew Davidson Then you might want to tell the entire scientific community, NASA, and all RS that say that's where it's going. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- It would be a permanent ring eclipse so the solar panels would work a little. Entering the quasi-orbit around L2 would be kind of a destination. Complex distant stuff tug-of-war causing quasi-orbits of nothing is pretty cool, L4 and L5 asteroids even need the Coriolis effect to orbit! Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Its final destination is an orbit. This happens to be true of every spacecraft not intended to land on/in something or sent on an escape trajectory. Though, since that something will inevitably be orbiting something else, if you wanted to be a real pedant you could say that counts too. For that matter, any trajectory can technically be considered an orbit, some just being hyperbolic orbits that never return to their origin point! --47.155.96.47 (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wait – For coverage with images. – Sca (talk) 13:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support add an image from the article. An orbit around the sun near L2 is a destination. Big news that it made it there in working condition. Article is solid. Jehochman Talk 02:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- The SOHO animation which someone has posted (right) shows a different satellite from the 20th century and so seems too confusing to be useful. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, would have to be a James Webb-specific animation. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Let's use the illustration at the top of this section. Jehochman Talk 14:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- That would work. There's apparently an animation on the article but it would need to say not to scale. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 14:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Let's use the illustration at the top of this section. Jehochman Talk 14:00, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, would have to be a James Webb-specific animation. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- This has been "in the news", with widespread coverage. I see no issue with posting. As a reminder, the idea of ITN is to help readers quickly access articles relevant to things that are getting covered "in the news". I don't see why it can't also be posted once the telescope sees first light. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 00:14, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Wait. Yes technically it has reached its physical destination, but it's not yet in scientific operation, which requires months of calibration and commissioning first. It seems better to WP:IAR and post whenever the first light images are released (which is likely to be less than 5 months). Those will be far more interesting and get a more substantial update to the article. Modest Genius talk 13:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose As the nom itself notes, nothing tangible except 'destination' reached. The launch had already been posted, wait for now. ITN is not an update ticker. Gotitbro (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Sheldon Silver
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT
Credits:
- Nominated by Davey2116 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: American politician, speaker of the New York state assembly (1994–2015), dies in prison at age 77. Article looks solid. Davey2116 (talk) 22:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This reads like an attack page. Someone knowledgeable needs to check the solidity of the sourcing and the appropriate balance. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Well, it is NYS politics... it's messy as hell in Albany. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support I've looked at the article and I believe it's ready. The article is well sourced and I do think it is balanced given the criminal biography aspect. He did die in prison, after all (well, seems he was transferred to a hospital, but he was still an inmate). I don't have POV concerns, and I am a native of New York who followed Silver's speakership and criminal proceedings somewhat. That said, another lead paragraph that doesn't mention his crimes could help. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Muboshgu. Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted Stephen 04:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Ayberk Pekcan
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): SOZCU, The News Int. oyeyeah
Credits:
- Nominated by Ainty Painty (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Ainty Painty (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. On a very quick look, badly needs some copy edits as well as sourcing for the entire filmography. I suspect when the puffery/repetition is removed it will appear very stubby. I would also strongly prefer that it did not link to the Turkish 'pedia without using the interlanguage link formatting which indicates which language the target is in. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) 2022 Burkinabé coup d'état
Blurb: In Burkina Faso, a coup d'état led by military officer Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba deposes President Roch Marc Christian Kaboré (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: In Burkina Faso, a coup d'état led by military officer Paul-Henri Sandaogo Damiba deposes President Roch Marc Christian Kaboré (pictured) and announces the dissolution of the parliament, government and constitution.
News source(s): BBC; Aljazzera; Reuters; France24 APNews
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by BastianMAT (talk · give credit)
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: A very major event, all RS reporting this, article needs updating and expanding before it is posted. Events might change in the coming hours, so the blurb may be updated accordingly. Honestly concerning like all previous coup d'etats. Update - Kabore deposed, government, parliament and constituion dissolved. [11] An ITNR tag has been added, as there is a ”Change in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government.” BastianMAT (talk) 10:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Major event. But article really needs an update. (PenangLion (talk) 10:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC))
- Oppose Seems like a chaotic situation and the article is similar, e.g. "The mutinying mutinying soldiers". And coups in Africa seem commonplace. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I do agree that the article needs a lot of work. However the news itself is more than noteworthy, and if the coup succeds, it will fall under ITNR. ”Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government.” The article is not ready, we don’t know the clear outcome of the coup yet, however the situation and a government change should be more than noteworthy. We will have to wait and see what happens, and in the meantime improve the article. BastianMAT (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Look at 2015 Burkinabé coup d'état. In that case, the coup didn't stick and the president was reinstated a week later. We're an encyclopedia, not a breaking news service, and will look bad if we post flip-flops. We should allow plenty of time to let the dust settle. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I do agree that the article needs a lot of work. However the news itself is more than noteworthy, and if the coup succeds, it will fall under ITNR. ”Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government.” The article is not ready, we don’t know the clear outcome of the coup yet, however the situation and a government change should be more than noteworthy. We will have to wait and see what happens, and in the meantime improve the article. BastianMAT (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support on significance, Oppose on quality. At the moment the article contains several sentences that don't make sense (e.g. "Although the government denied the ongoing coup in the country."), Unencyclopedic writing, what appears to be several unsourced statements (e.g. The Military are scheduled to make an announcement) and a couple of sections which are either blank or contain a single sentence. With a bit of expansion and copyediting this would be a good thing to post though. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 12:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
France24 (most reliable western msm for Africa) says the prez is being held by the mil https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220124-burkina-faso-president-kabore-held-by-mutinying-soldiers-sources-tell-france-24?ref=tw_i
- That's a live feed and what it actually says currently is "Uncertainty in Burkina Faso over fate of President Kaboré". Andrew🐉(talk) 13:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - In terms of notability, it's clearly a major geopolitical event. The quality of the article is currently lacking but most major media sources are covering it now (as of 8:00 AM EST), so it should improve rapidly over the next day or two. --Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 13:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality as article needs expansion, and also source checking (the Sputnik Mundo source looks like it's depreciated according to Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_296#RfC:_Sputnik). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Kaboré held, etc. AP, BBC, France24 – Sca (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support on notability. Not ready yet on quality. Vanilla Wizard 💙 15:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support as Pikamander2 noted, the article has plenty of potential for improvement. I'll see what I might be able to contribute. Ludicrous (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support because it's important enough & the article is good enough. Jim Michael (talk) 17:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - there are two orange tags at the moment, which are usually blockers to posting. — Amakuru (talk) 17:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Update - Kabore deposed, government, parliament and constituion dissolved. [12] An ITNR tag has been added, as there is a ”Change in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government.” BastianMAT (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support on significance, as it made NYT push alert. Haven't investigated quality. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support when article is deemed suitable, per above. DarkSide830 (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support once article is ready to go. Coups are big news. The Kip (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- There are two orange tags to expand, one in background and one in the coup section. Please fix this before we can post. --Tone 08:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Tone: Fixed it, article seems to be pretty good now, should be ready for a front page.
- Posting. --Tone 09:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Alright nice, @Tone: can you add the nom to my profile? Thinking of adding a display on my profile of all articles I have contributed and nominated to pretty soon. Cheers and have a great day mate! BastianMAT (talk) 09:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Presenting this as a done deal seems quite improper. Look at what happened last time – ITN rushed to post after just one day but then, a week later, the President was reinstated. The blurb says that the President has been "deposed" but the rebels themselves say that he has been "suspended". The reality seems to be that he's being held prisoner but now the challenge for the rebels is whether they can convince everyone that they are in charge. And can they then establish a functioning administration. A lot will depend on how foreign governments react, especially France.
- Remember the march on the Capitol, when the result of the US election was being challenged? In such circumstances, it's a power struggle and the rebels don't always win. We should not rush to declare a winner in such confused and chaotic circumstances.
- Andrew🐉(talk) 10:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- This is not about convincing "everyone that they are in charge". The classic goal of every coup seems to have been achieved - the president is no longer in power. So, as an accomplished coup, this has been duly posted. If things change, the blurb could be bumped higher to reflect those changes. Brandmeistertalk 14:21, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Any reason why Burkina Faso isn't a wikilink in the posted blurb? As someone unfamiliar with the country I would have appreciated one, as I wasn't initially sure whether it was a country, a province or other territory. 82.15.196.46 (talk) 15:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is a long-standing convention that nation states are not Wikilinked in ITN as part of the MOS:OVERLINK principle - the idea being that most people have heard of most countries. I guess Burkina Faso is probably close to the bottom of the recognizability stakes for most people, but we apply a level playing field for all. (I went there on holiday once, so I do know a bit more about it myself!) — Amakuru (talk) 23:47, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
(Closed) 5G
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Blurb: Activation of 5G in the US is delayed by concerns about aircraft safety (Post)
News source(s): NYT; CNN; Times of India
Credits:
- Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Beland (talk · give credit)
Article updated
- Maybe ongoing? There doesn't seem to be a single event to hang our hat on. 331dot (talk) 10:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- The main event was that C band was activated by the networks on 19 Jan but the aviation sector wasn't ready for this and so there's been some pushback. Andrew🐉(talk) 12:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – A non-event, so far. – Sca (talk) 16:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- support Beside importance, we arguably have a duty to show people why this is being done so that they don't instead jump onto conspiracy theories about 5g spreading covid or whatever 5.44.170.26 (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
we arguably have a duty to show people why this is being done so that they don't instead jump onto conspiracy theories about 5g spreading covid or whatever
Wikipedia has no such duty. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality whilst the section on Aviation and this event may be well sourced, the rest of that 5G is awful, orange-tagged in many places. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - I don't want to invoke the "local news" angle, which as we know is not accepted as valid, but even so I'm not sure this is really a major enough story to warrant posting on a global encyclopedia. I know the US is a global superpower and the biggest market for en-wiki, but even so, would we post similar stories relating to the rollout of 5G in other countries such as Brazil, India and Japan? Also, as noted, quality is a long-way off at present. — Amakuru (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- The issue affects international air travel – notice the Times of India story from the other side of the world, explaining how this was affecting Air India. And it's easy to find more international coverage like this, e.g. Airlines across the world, including the long-haul carrier Emirates, are rushing to cancel or change flights.... The story is more global than the small earthquakes and bus plunges which we routinely post. Andrew🐉(talk) 14:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose as things stand. Notable, but not notable enough on a global or even national scale. Unless this eventually causes real issues for the average person then I don't think this is ITN level. DarkSide830 (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note that this is only for service using certain frequencies, specifically those in the C band. The blurb as-is is technically correct but prone to misleading the reader. 5G service using other frequencies has already been in use in the U.S. (*looks at phone with "5G" icon in status bar*) Unless it starts causing major disruptions this is kind of "inside baseball" regulatory stuff. Now, a number of these articles would be great for DYK if improved, and they could definitely use improvement. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 01:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 14:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per above, I fail to see the significance at this point of the story. Canadianerk (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Question Why is this a problem only in the United States? Are they using different frequencies to everyone else? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:01, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly? It's up to government regulators what frequencies get approved for use in different applications. In fact, cell phones in different markets often have different chips because of different cell standards in use. Notably, North America has deployment of CDMA networks that aren't really used elsewhere. --47.155.96.47 (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Status quo isn't really news. Juxlos (talk) 03:10, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Battle of al-Hasakah (2022)
Blurb: In al-Hasakah, Syria, Islamic State attacks the al-Sina'a prison to free captured terrorists. (Post)
News source(s): CBS News, Middle East Eye, Washington Post
Credits:
- Nominated by Ainty Painty (talk · give credit)
- Created by ThePaganUK (talk · give credit)
- Updated by ThePaganUK (talk · give credit) and Des Vallee (talk · give credit)
Ainty Painty (talk) 03:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support because it's easily important enough & the article is good enough to post. Jim Michael (talk) 15:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Almost all the cites in the article are to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights. As far as I've seen, this event has been absent from main RS news sights. More sources would be necessary before posting. – Sca (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- It includes refs from several other sources, including The Daily Telegraph & The Washington Post. Jim Michael (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I notice that our article on Middle East Eye states, "the governments of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt and Bahrain accuse MEE of pro-Muslim Brotherhood bias." – ?? — Sca (talk) 19:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- It includes refs from several other sources, including The Daily Telegraph & The Washington Post. Jim Michael (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose ongoing Would make sense to post this as an item first since it is based around a singular event. SpencerT•C 00:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - added blurb suggestion per Spencer. - Indefensible (talk) 07:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support - agreed statement per User:Spencer (PenangLion (talk) 14:33, 25 January 2022 (UTC))
- Oppose - For something as contentious as a war and alleged human rights abuses, a wide range of sources would be required, but there is a strong dominance to SOHR. The WP article on SOHR says is a one-man-band and supposedly biased. Bumbubookworm (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose on quality for the sourcing issues raised by Bumbubookworm. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
January 23
January 23, 2022
(Sunday)
Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health and environment
Politics and elections
|
(Posted) RD: Edgar S. Cahn
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Washington Post; The New York Times
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Some items are mentioned in the lede but not the body, such as Timebanking and his academic positions other than Antioch. Joofjoof (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Joofjoof: done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Lead mentions that he created TimeBanking and was "CEO of TimeBanks USA" but the body has no additional information about that. Another 2-4 sentences would be helpful (what does TimeBanks USA do?), and once resolved, would be willing to support. SpencerT•C 05:35, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Spencer: done. —Bloom6132 (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support. SpencerT•C 17:13, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 19:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Beegie Adair
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Tennessean; NPR; Associated Press
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Bloom6132 (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Bloom6132 (talk) 07:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support Article text is short (2821 characters), but both text and discography are fully sourced. Joofjoof (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. --PFHLai (talk) 10:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: R. Nagaswamy
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Hindu
Credits:
- Updated and nominated by Ktin (talk · give credit)
- Updated by Ravichandar84 (talk · give credit) and Pachu Kannan (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Indian archaeologist. Padma Bhushan awardee. Article requires some work to get to homepage levels of hygiene. Edits done. Article meets hygiene levels for homepage / RD. A good C-class biography. Ktin (talk) 06:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Long enough (500+ words), formatting looks fine, and there are enough footnotes in expected spots, this wikibio is READY for RD. One minor thing to sort out: as he was the first director of the Tamil Nadu Archaeology Department, how come there is a predecessor listed in the infobox? Who was first? --PFHLai (talk) 10:11, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @PFHLai:. This one was gnawing me as well, but I had held off on updating it. I have requested one other editor user:Pachu Kannan to help untie this one. But, in the meantime, I have removed the 'first' reference. It does seem like TNR was the director from 1964 to 1966. With that this one is good to go. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this, Ktin. I am not sure, but it seems to me that TNR was indeed the predecessor except that he had a different title. The table at the bottom of this webpage indicated that RN took over from TNR as "Special Officer" in charge of the operations in 1966, and his title was changed to 'Director' near the end of that year. So I am under the impression that "first Director" or "inaugural Director" would indeed be appropriate for RN, but not "founding Director". More sourcing would be helpful here. IMO, this is a small thing and should not stall this RD nom. There is no doubt that he led the operations for many years. However, the articles on Tamil Nadu Archaeology Department and T. N. Ramachandran may need some tweaking to keep things consistent in the wiki. --PFHLai (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done. You were right. Added a footnote for TNR (who was really a special officer). Source is here.[1]
- Thanks for looking into this, Ktin. I am not sure, but it seems to me that TNR was indeed the predecessor except that he had a different title. The table at the bottom of this webpage indicated that RN took over from TNR as "Special Officer" in charge of the operations in 1966, and his title was changed to 'Director' near the end of that year. So I am under the impression that "first Director" or "inaugural Director" would indeed be appropriate for RN, but not "founding Director". More sourcing would be helpful here. IMO, this is a small thing and should not stall this RD nom. There is no doubt that he led the operations for many years. However, the articles on Tamil Nadu Archaeology Department and T. N. Ramachandran may need some tweaking to keep things consistent in the wiki. --PFHLai (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted. Already posted on MainPage ~10 hours ago. --PFHLai (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
RD: Thierry Mugler
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): People
Credits:
- Nominated by Stephen (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: French fashion designer Stephen 00:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- You’re missing a source, I took the liberty to add one. Trillfendi (talk) 00:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Significant death, article is well cited. Morgan695 (talk) 04:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose multiple citation needed tags, and multiple other sentences also need sourcing. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
(Posted) RD: Jean-Claude Mézières
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): "Décès de Jean-Claude Mézières, cocréateur de la BD "Valérian et Laureline"". Radio Télévision Suisse (in French). 2022-01-23. Retrieved 2022-01-23.
Credits:
- Nominated by Sandstein (talk · give credit)
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Seminal French BD author (Valérian et Laureline). Sandstein 19:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support. Tagged as "Good Article", so whatever needs to be done should be minimal. Fram (talk) 08:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Four Cn's outstanding.—Bagumba (talk) 14:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I have removed three of the four CN-tagged bits, and sourced one. Should be good to go now! Fram (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support GA and no outstanding citation needed tags. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Posted --PFHLai (talk) 06:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Resignation of Armenian President Armen Sarkissian
Blurb: Armenian President Armen Sarkissian resigns. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Alen Simonyan becomes acting president of Armenia
News source(s): Reuters, Le Figaro
Credits:
- Nominated by Mooonswimmer (talk · give credit)
- Created by Ianhowlett (talk · give credit)
Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: Resignation of a head of state. Mooonswimmer 17:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Noting that in Armenia the PM is more powerful than the president(and the president cited that as a reason for his resignation). 331dot (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose If the resignation of a prime minister is hardly blurb-worthy, much less so when it's a head of state without executive powers. _-_Alsoriano97 (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – Per Alsoriano. Parochial politix. – Sca (talk) 17:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Along with the aforementioned concerns of notability, the article itself doesn't provide more context than "He resigned on 23 January 2022." Ludicrous (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- Not Ready for the usual reason. It would also be desirable to name his successor if possible. That said, this is probably WP:ITNR so once article quality is up to scratch it should be posted. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is not ITNR. GreatCaesarsGhost 01:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- "*Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government, in those countries which qualify under the criteria above, as listed at List of current heads of state and government except when that change was already posted as part of a general election."[2] What am I missing? -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- List of current heads of state and government says it's the PM that administers the executive. Our own article on President of Armenia calls him a figurehead, in so many words. —Cryptic 03:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- "*Changes in the holder of the office which administer the executive of their respective state/government, in those countries which qualify under the criteria above, as listed at List of current heads of state and government except when that change was already posted as part of a general election."[2] What am I missing? -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is not ITNR. GreatCaesarsGhost 01:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment @Cryptic: so in other words, you mean he’s just head of state rather than head of government? Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom could also be seen as a “figurehead,” but would we not post that just as we’d post the succession of their PM? 2600:6C44:237F:ACCB:35E6:356B:5DCE:E4E8 (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- It would be posted, but it probably wouldn't be covered under ITNR.--2600:1700:4579:B80:A946:24EB:504C:7E5A (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Queen Elizabeth is also the head of state of more than one country. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Indeed. She is one of the most recognisable and widely-covered individuals of the past century and would certainly warrant a blurb were she to die or leave office, despite not being ITN/R or having any real power. In fact, we even blurbed her husband's death.
- Queen Elizabeth is also the head of state of more than one country. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- It would be posted, but it probably wouldn't be covered under ITNR.--2600:1700:4579:B80:A946:24EB:504C:7E5A (talk) 23:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I added the altblurb, but don't support or oppose it. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- I would note that Simonyan is technically only acting President. Wizardoftheyear (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not a head of the government, just a ceremonial position. — Amakuru (talk) 08:07, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Who is Who | Department Of Archaeology". www.tnarch.gov.in. Retrieved 2022-01-29.
- ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:In_the_news&oldid=1017989369#ITNR_heads_of_state_/_government.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help)
- Comment – Stale. – Sca (talk) 13:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
References
Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com]
rather than using <ref></ref>
tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.
For the times when <ref></ref>
tags are being used, here are their contents: