Jump to content

User talk:4TheWynne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81 - "Ash Barty: new section"
Ash Barty: new section
Line 43: Line 43:


I'm hopeful this whole discussion isn't re-litigated but it seems Fyunck(Click) might persist, given they were involved in the discussion nearly two and a half years ago, then two years ago, and is again now editing the same word. I am not sure why it is causing so much angst, but wanted to say thanks for your consistency and balanced view on this, and hope it isn't removed again going forward. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81|2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81#top|talk]]) 10:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I'm hopeful this whole discussion isn't re-litigated but it seems Fyunck(Click) might persist, given they were involved in the discussion nearly two and a half years ago, then two years ago, and is again now editing the same word. I am not sure why it is causing so much angst, but wanted to say thanks for your consistency and balanced view on this, and hope it isn't removed again going forward. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81|2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81]] ([[User talk:2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81#top|talk]]) 10:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Ash Barty ==

Hello, I was wondering as to why you reverted the change to the current ranking of Ash Barty. The date should be the 31st January 2022, as that's the most recent rankings list (not the 9th September 2019). Please reply, as I would like to know if I did anything wrong.

Thanks

Revision as of 05:49, 31 January 2022

Hello, 4TheWynne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled eleventh Metallica studio album".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:06, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VFL player statistics start

Template:VFL player statistics start has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VFL/AFL player statistics start

Template:VFL/AFL player statistics start has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ash Barty

G'day!

Thanks for your recent edit on the Ash Barty page.

I've read the Archived discussion from a few years ago about including 'Indigenous' in a somewhat prominent spot in the lead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ashleigh_Barty/Archive_1

It seemed to have been agreed, at least implicitly, that having 'fellow Indigenous Australian' was fine (especially given that wording has remained for a couple of years without controversy). The final edit itself was a happy compromise from the original discussion. Indeed you were a part of that discussion and had the last relevant point:

For what it's worth, I think Sportsfan77777's most recent version ("...and is the second Australian WTA singles No. 1 after fellow Indigenous Australian player Evonne Goolagong Cawley.") would be the best compromise, as it moves it up the section and gives the fact greater emphasis, but not too much. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 06:02, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Re-visiting the edits from January 2020, it appears Fyunck(Click) seemed to accept this approach given they very soon after undertook subsequent edits to the page without changing the lead.

I'm hopeful this whole discussion isn't re-litigated but it seems Fyunck(Click) might persist, given they were involved in the discussion nearly two and a half years ago, then two years ago, and is again now editing the same word. I am not sure why it is causing so much angst, but wanted to say thanks for your consistency and balanced view on this, and hope it isn't removed again going forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:ED10:B501:9CE6:E865:E108:DC81 (talk) 10:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ash Barty

Hello, I was wondering as to why you reverted the change to the current ranking of Ash Barty. The date should be the 31st January 2022, as that's the most recent rankings list (not the 9th September 2019). Please reply, as I would like to know if I did anything wrong.

Thanks