Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports Time: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 03:39, 1 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:13, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sports Time

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources. Sports Time lived less than a year and has very little coverage in online sources. Not enough notability for a separate article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep According to the Google search "sports-time anheuser-busch site:google.com/newspapers", there are about 489,000 hits. A TV channel owned by Anheuser-Busch that went under seems like a notable topic. The article would benefit from sourcing and improvement, rather than deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Substantial sources exist. [1][2][3]. Worth keeping and improving. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources found by Arxiloxos, Needs improving not deleting. –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Muboshgu & sources added by Arxiloxos. Passes WP:GNG.--JayJasper (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - adequate sources exist to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 *'''Keep''' per Muboshgu & sources added by Arxiloxos. Passes [[WP:GNG]].--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 18:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' - adequate sources exist to meet GNG. [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 14:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>