Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ómar Jóhannsson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:44, 2 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:49, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ómar Jóhannsson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod was challenged. Has appeared for a third tier Swedish club and an Icelandic club. Don't believe he meets notability guidelines. Echetus Xe 11:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 00:38, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 00:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - PROD contest reasoning was flawed. Neither the Swedish third division nor the Icelandic first division are fully pro, therefore he fails WP:ATHLETE. There is insufficient coverage for him to meet WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 *'''Delete''' - fails [[WP:ATHLETE]] and [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 00:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - PROD contest reasoning was flawed. Neither the Swedish third division nor the Icelandic first division are fully pro, therefore he fails [[WP:ATHLETE]]. There is insufficient coverage for him to meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Sir Sputnik|Sir Sputnik]] ([[User talk:Sir Sputnik|talk]]) 15:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>