Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autexousious: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 02:01, 5 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 03:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autexousious

I believe this to be a hoax or a not notable neoglism. See goggle search [1] No Dictionary definitions, just a bunch of MySpace pages and similar accounts, probably an internet handle. In addition, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. DFS454 (talk) 14:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NAD, ~~WP:NEO#Articles on neologisms and WP:NFT~~. JohnCD (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or transwiki - Delete as a dictionary definition, nothing more. I do not think it's a hoax or a neologism. See [2]. Possibly transwiki to wiktionary if its status as a historical word can be confirmed. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 16:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting. I withdraw NEO and NFT, but it's still a dicdef; and I doubt if it meets Wikitionary's inclusion criteria which are quite strict, e.g. three independent instances. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki - It would appear from the cluster of Google hits found that this word has or is gaining currency in the BDSM community. But this would still only qualify it for a Wiktionary entry. If the author wishes to expand the article to give some background within the community, a useful encyclopedia entry might emerge. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NAR Also no reliable sources. --Artene50 (talk) 04:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Revision as of 08:30, 10 October 2021 edit MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2) Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 02:01, 5 February 2022 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*Delete per [[WP:NAR]] Also no reliable sources. --[[User:Artene50\|Artene50]] ([[User talk:Artene50\|talk]]) 04:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)		*Delete per [[WP:NAR]] Also no reliable sources. --[[User:Artene50\|Artene50]] ([[User talk:Artene50\|talk]]) 04:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>