Jump to content

C. Christine Fair: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[accepted revision][accepted revision]
Content deleted Content added
m Minor changes and fixed url-status in source 13
Tag: Reverted
m revert sock
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|American political scientist and professor}}
{{short description|American political scientist. and professor}}
{{pp-pc1}}
{{pp-pc1}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2019}}
{{Use American English|date=September 2018}}
{{Use American English|date=September 2018}}
{{Infobox academic|name=C. Christine Fair|image=C. Christine Fair at New America.jpg|caption=C. Christine Fair at [[New America (organization)|New America]] event "Afghanistan Eight Years On" in 2009|birth_name=Carol Christine Fair|birth_date={{birth year and age|1968}}|nationality=American|alma_mater=[[University of Chicago]] <small>([[Bachelor of Science|BS]], [[Master of Arts|MA]], [[Doctor of Philosophy|PhD]])</small>|workplaces=[[Georgetown University]]}}
{{Infobox academic|name=C. Christine Fair|image=C. Christine Fair at New America.jpg|caption=C. Christine Fair at [[New America (organization)|New America]] event "Afghanistan Eight Years On" in 2009|birth_name=Carol Christine Fair|birth_date={{birth year and age|1968}}|nationality=American|alma_mater=[[University of Chicago]] <small>([[Doctor of Philosophy|PhD]], [[Master of Arts|MA]], [[Bachelor of Science|BS]])</small>|workplaces=[[Georgetown University]]}}
'''Carol Christine Fair''' (born 1968) is an American [[Political science|political scientist]]. She is an associate professor in the Security Studies Program within the [[Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service]] at [[Georgetown University]]. Her work is primarily focused on [[counter-terrorism]] and [[South Asia]]n topics.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lawfareblog.com/indias-move-kashmir-unpacking-domestic-and-international-motivations-and-implications|title=India's Move in Kashmir: Unpacking the Domestic and International Motivations and Implications|website=Lawfare|date=August 12, 2019}}</ref>

'''Carol Christine Fair''' (born 1968) is an American [[Political science|political scientist]] and associate professor at [[Georgetown University]] in [[Washington, D.C.]], in the [[Security studies|Security Studies]] Program within the [[Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service]]. Her work is primarily focused on [[counter-terrorism]] and [[South Asia]]n topics.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.lawfareblog.com/indias-move-kashmir-unpacking-domestic-and-international-motivations-and-implications|title=India's Move in Kashmir: Unpacking the Domestic and International Motivations and Implications|website=Lawfare|date=August 12, 2019}}</ref>


== Academic career ==
== Academic career ==
Fair received her [[Doctor of Philosophy|Ph.D.]] from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the [[University of Chicago]] in 2004.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|title=Carol Christine Fair|website=[[ResearchGate]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161121121035/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|archive-date=November 21, 2016|url-status=live|access-date=September 30, 2018}}</ref> Previously, she had received her [[Bachelor of Science]] and [[Master of Arts]] degree from the same university.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|title=Carol C Fair|website=Georgetown University|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923055005/https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|archive-date=September 23, 2018|url-status=live|access-date=September 30, 2018}}</ref>
Fair received her PhD from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the [[University of Chicago]] in 2004.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|title=Carol Christine Fair|website=[[ResearchGate]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161121121035/https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carol_Fair|archive-date=November 21, 2016|url-status=live|access-date=September 30, 2018}}</ref> Previously, she received a masters of arts and [[Bachelor of Science]] from the same university.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|title=Carol C Fair|website=Georgetown University|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180923055005/https://gufaculty360.georgetown.edu/s/faculty-profile?netid=ccf33%2F|archive-date=September 23, 2018|url-status=live|access-date=September 30, 2018}}</ref>


Fair served as a senior political scientist with the [[RAND Corporation]], political officer with the UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, and a senior research associate with the [[United States Institute of Peace]]. She specializes in political and military affairs in South Asia.<ref>[https://global.oup.com/academic/product/fighting-to-the-end-9780199892709?cc=gb&lang=en&# Author information], Oxford University Press, retrieved September 6, 2016.</ref> She has served as a senior fellow at West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, a senior resident fellow at the [[Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses|Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses]] (New Delhi), and took a [[Reagan–Fascell Democracy Fellowship]] in the spring of 2017.<ref name=":0" />
Fair served as a senior political scientist with the [[RAND Corporation]], political officer with the UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, and a senior research associate with the [[United States Institute of Peace]]. She specializes in political and military affairs in South Asia.<ref>[https://global.oup.com/academic/product/fighting-to-the-end-9780199892709?cc=gb&lang=en&# Author information], Oxford University Press, retrieved September 6, 2016.</ref> She has served as a senior fellow at West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, a senior resident fellow at the [[Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses|Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses]] (New Delhi), and took a [[Reagan–Fascell Democracy Fellowship]] in the spring of 2017.<ref name=":0" />
Line 19: Line 18:


== Academic controversies ==
== Academic controversies ==
Fair's work and viewpoints have been the subject of criticism.<ref name="Salon">{{Cite news|last=Norton |first=Ben |date=November 4, 2015 |title=Not playing fair: How Christine Fair, defender of U.S. drone program in Pakistan, twists the facts — and may have conflicts of her own |url=http://www.salon.com/2015/11/04/i_am_a_rambo_bch_meet_the_drone_defender_who_hates_neo_cons_attacks_glenn_greenwald_and_may_have_conflicts_of_her_own/ |website=Salon |access-date=November 4, 2015 }}</ref> In 2015, journalist [[Glenn Greenwald]] claimed Fair's arguments in support of drone strikes are "rank propaganda", arguing that there is "enormous amounts of evidence" depicting drones are counterproductive; claiming they result in 'mass civilian casualties' by citing independent studies.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2015/10/drone-strikes-create-terrorists-kill-151023152321140.html|title=Do drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill?|work=Al Jazeera|date=October 23, 2015|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref>
Fair's work and viewpoints have been the subject of criticism.<ref name="Salon">{{Cite news|last=Norton |first=Ben |date=November 4, 2015 |title=Not playing fair: How Christine Fair, defender of U.S. drone program in Pakistan, twists the facts — and may have conflicts of her own |url=http://www.salon.com/2015/11/04/i_am_a_rambo_bch_meet_the_drone_defender_who_hates_neo_cons_attacks_glenn_greenwald_and_may_have_conflicts_of_her_own/ |website=Salon |access-date=November 4, 2015 }}</ref> In 2015, journalist [[Glenn Greenwald]] dismissed Fair's arguments in support of drone strikes as "rank propaganda", arguing there are "enormous amounts of evidence" showing drones are counterproductive, pointing to mass civilian casualties and independent studies.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2015/10/drone-strikes-create-terrorists-kill-151023152321140.html|title=Do drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill?|work=Al Jazeera|date=October 23, 2015|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref> Commenting on her debate with Greenwald, [[Brookings Institution]] senior fellow Shadi Hamid called Fair's arguments "surprisingly weak".<ref name="Salon"/> In 2010, Fair denied the notion that drones caused any civilian deaths, alleging Pakistani media reports were responsible for creating this perception.<ref name="Scahill">{{cite news|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/georgetown-professor-drones-are-not-killing-innocent-civilians-pakistan/|title=Georgetown Professor: 'Drones Are Not Killing Innocent Civilians' in Pakistan|work=The Nation|date=May 10, 2010|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Jeremy|last=Scahill}}</ref> [[Jeremy Scahill]] wrote that Fair's statement was "simply false" and contradicted by [[New America (organization)|New America]]'s detailed study on drone casualties.<ref name="Scahill"/> Fair later said that casualties are caused by the UAVs, but maintains they are the most effective tool for fighting terrorism.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/world/asia/12drones.html?_r=0|title=C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes|work=The New York Times|date=August 11, 2011|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Scott|last=Shane}}</ref>

Commenting on her debate with Greenwald, [[Brookings Institution]] senior fellow Shadi Hamid labelled Fair's arguments as "surprisingly weak".<ref name="Salon"/>

In 2010, Fair denied the notion that drones caused any civilian deaths, pointing out how Pakistani nationalist media reports were responsible for [[Media_bias_in_South_Asia#Pakistan|creating this perception]].<ref name="Scahill">{{cite news|url=https://www.thenation.com/article/georgetown-professor-drones-are-not-killing-innocent-civilians-pakistan/|title=Georgetown Professor: 'Drones Are Not Killing Innocent Civilians' in Pakistan|work=The Nation|date=May 10, 2010|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Jeremy|last=Scahill}}</ref> [[Jeremy Scahill]] wrote an article for [[The Nation]], a weekly magazine with a [[Media_bias_in_the_United_States#Liberal|leftist-political bias]]<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.allsides.com/news-source/nation-media-bias|title=The Nation media bias rating is Left.|access-date=February 4, 2022|url-status=live|work=[[AllSides]]|language=en}}</ref>, calling Fair's statement "simply false" and contradicted; citing a detailed study on drone casualties done by the [[New America (organization)|New America Foundation]], a [[Think tank|think-tank]] with a [[Left-wing_politics#Social_progressivism_and_counterculture|Left-wing]] bias.<ref name="Scahill"/><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/new-america-foundation/|title=Influence Watch &#124; New America (New America Foundation)|access-date=February 4, 2022|url-status=live|work=InfluenceWatch|language=en}}</ref> Fair later said that casualties are caused by the UAVs, but maintained that they are the most effective tool for [[Counterterrorism|fighting terrorism]].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/world/asia/12drones.html?_r=0|title=C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes|work=The New York Times|date=August 11, 2011|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Scott|last=Shane}}</ref>


Writing for ''[[The Atlantic]]'', [[Conor Friedersdorf]] challenged Fair's co-authored narrative that the U.S. could legitimize support in Pakistan for its drone program using 'education' and 'public diplomacy'; calling it an "example of interventionist hubris and naivete" built upon flawed interpretation of public opinion data.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/yes-pakistanis-really-do-hate-americas-killer-drones/272468|title=Yes, Pakistanis Really Do Hate America's Killer Drones|work=The Atlantic|date=January 24, 2013|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Conor|last=Friedersdorf}}</ref> An article in the [[Middle East Research and Information Project]] called the work "some of the most propagandistic writing in support of President [[Barack Obama]]’s targeted kill lists to date".<ref name="Waheed">{{cite web|url=http://www.merip.org/drones-us-propaganda-imperial-hubris|title=Drones, US Propaganda and Imperial Hubris|work=Middle East Research and Information Project|first=Sarah|last=Waheed|date=January 25, 2013|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref> Further insisting that it censured the view that Pakistanis needed to be informed by the U.S. what is "good for them" as fraught with imperialist condescension; or the assumption that the [[Urdu]] press was less informed than the English press – because the latter was sometimes less critical of the U.S.<ref name="Waheed"/>
Writing for ''[[The Atlantic]]'', [[Conor Friedersdorf]] challenged Fair's co-authored narrative that the U.S. could legitimize support in Pakistan for its drone program using 'education' and 'public diplomacy'; he called it an "example of interventionist hubris and naivete" built upon flawed interpretation of public opinion data.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/yes-pakistanis-really-do-hate-americas-killer-drones/272468|title=Yes, Pakistanis Really Do Hate America's Killer Drones|work=The Atlantic|date=January 24, 2013|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Conor|last=Friedersdorf}}</ref> An article in the [[Middle East Research and Information Project]] called the work "some of the most propagandistic writing in support of President [[Barack Obama]]’s targeted kill lists to date."<ref name="Waheed">{{cite web|url=http://www.merip.org/drones-us-propaganda-imperial-hubris|title=Drones, US Propaganda and Imperial Hubris|work=Middle East Research and Information Project|first=Sarah|last=Waheed|date=January 25, 2013|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref> It censured the view that Pakistanis needed to be informed by the U.S. what is "good for them" as fraught with imperialist condescension; or the assumption that the [[Urdu]] press was less informed than the English press – because the latter was sometimes less critical of the U.S.<ref name="Waheed"/>


Fair's journalistic sources was questioned for their credibility by [[Al Jazeera]] journalist Muhammad Idrees Ahmad.<ref name="Ahmad">{{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/06/2011613931606455.html|title=The magical realism of body counts|work=Al Jazeera|date=June 14, 2011|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Muhammad Idrees|last=Ahmad}}</ref> Fair was accused of having a '[[conflict of interest]]' due to her past work with U.S. government think tanks, as well as the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]].<ref name="Salon"/> In 2011 and 2012, she received funding from the [[Embassy of the United States, Islamabad|U.S. embassy in Islamabad]] to conduct a survey on public opinion concerning militancy. However, Fair confirmed that most of the grants went to a survey firm and that it had no influence on her research.<ref name="Salon"/> [[Pakistani media|Pakistani-Nationalist media]] analysts have inaccurately called Fair's views as "hawkish rhetoric", accusing her work of being riddled with 'factual inaccuracies', having a 'lack of objectivity', and 'being selectively biased'.<ref name="Ahmad"/><ref name="Haider">{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/729946/an-unfair-comment|title=An unFair comment|work=Dawn|first=Murtaza|last=Haider|date=June 27, 2012|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref><ref name="TN">{{cite news|url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/96617-US-professors-anti-Pak-agenda|title=US professor's anti-Pak agenda?|work=The News|date=February 7, 2016|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Prejudice Dominates Christine Discourse|work=[[Islamabad Policy Research Institute]]|first=Khalid|last=Chandio|date=May 6, 2015}}</ref> Fair has also been harassed and falsely accused by [[Pakistani_nationalism#Nationalism_and_politics|Pakistani-Nationalists]] of having 'double standards', 'partisanship towards [[India]]' and funded by the [[Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh|Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS)]], and has been criticized for her contacts with [[Baloch_nationalism#Modern_Baloch_nationalism|activists and leaders]] from [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]], a link which they claim "raises serious questions" if her interest in Pakistan 'is merely academic or not'.<ref name="TN"/>
Fair's journalistic sources have been questioned for their credibility<ref name="Ahmad">{{cite news|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/06/2011613931606455.html|title=The magical realism of body counts|work=Al Jazeera|date=June 14, 2011|access-date=September 6, 2016|first=Muhammad Idrees|last=Ahmad}}</ref> and she has been accused of having a [[conflict of interest]] due to her past work with U.S. government think tanks, as well as the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]].<ref name="Salon"/> In 2011 and 2012, she received funding from the [[Embassy of the United States, Islamabad|U.S. embassy in Islamabad]] to conduct a survey on public opinion concerning militancy. However, Fair states most of the grants went to a survey firm and that it had no influence on her research.<ref name="Salon"/> [[Pakistani media]] analysts have dismissed Fair's views as hawkish rhetoric, riddled with factual inaccuracies, lack of objectivity, and being selectively biased.<ref name="Ahmad"/><ref name="Haider">{{cite news|url=http://www.dawn.com/news/729946/an-unfair-comment|title=An unFair comment|work=Dawn|first=Murtaza|last=Haider|date=June 27, 2012|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref><ref name="TN">{{cite news|url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/96617-US-professors-anti-Pak-agenda|title=US professor's anti-Pak agenda?|work=The News|date=February 7, 2016|access-date=September 6, 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Prejudice Dominates Christine Discourse|work=[[Islamabad Policy Research Institute]]|first=Khalid|last=Chandio|date=May 6, 2015}}</ref> She has also been rebuked{{by whom|date=March 2019}} for comments on social media perceived as provocative, such as suggesting burning down Pakistan's embassy in Afghanistan or asking India to "squash Pakistan militarily, diplomatically, politically and economically."{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} She has been accused of double standards, partisanship towards [[India]], and has been criticized for her contacts with dissident leaders from [[Balochistan, Pakistan|Balochistan]], a link which they claim "raises serious questions if her interest in Pakistan is merely academic."<ref name="TN"/>


== Personal controversies ==
== Personal controversies ==
In January 2017, Fair was involved in a [[Twitter]] dispute with [[Indian Americans|Indian-American]] author and professor [[Asra Nomani|Asra Q. Nomani]]. In response to Nomani's tweet that as a [[Muslim]], she voted for [[Donald Trump|President Trump]], Fair tweeted that she had "written [Nomani] off as a human being" and that Nomani had "pimped herself out to all media outlets." Nomani responded by filing a complaint with Georgetown University, Fair's employer, alleging discrimination and harassment.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/01/06/muslim-woman-who-voted-for-trump-asks-georgetown-to-intervene-over-professors-hateful-vulgar-messages/|title=Muslim woman who voted for Trump asks Georgetown to intervene over professor's 'hateful, vulgar' messages|last=Moyer|first=Justin Wm.|date=January 6, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=February 5, 2018}}</ref>
In January 2017, Fair was involved in a [[Twitter]] dispute with [[Asra Nomani|Asra Q. Nomani]]. In response to Nomani's tweet that as a [[Muslims|Muslim]], she voted for [[Donald Trump|President Trump]], Fair tweeted that she had "written [Nomani] off as a human being" and that Nomani had "pimped herself out to all media outlets." Nomani responded by filing a complaint with Georgetown University, Fair's employer, alleging discrimination and harassment.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/01/06/muslim-woman-who-voted-for-trump-asks-georgetown-to-intervene-over-professors-hateful-vulgar-messages/|title=Muslim woman who voted for Trump asks Georgetown to intervene over professor's 'hateful, vulgar' messages|last=Moyer|first=Justin Wm.|date=January 6, 2017|newspaper=The Washington Post|access-date=February 5, 2018}}</ref>


In May 2017, Fair began an altercation with [[White nationalism|white-nationalist]] [[Richard B. Spencer]] at a gym in [[Alexandria, Virginia]]. While the two were working out, Fair approached Spencer and called him out for being a [[Nazi]], along with a number of other accusations, leading a third gym patron to intervene on behalf of him. This incident resulted in Spencer's membership being terminated by the manager of the gym.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html#incart_most-comments|title=Professor confronts white nationalist at the gym - which terminates his membership|date=May 21, 2017|work=[[The Times-Picayune|Nola.com]]|access-date=September 30, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306000842/https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html|archive-date=March 6, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
In May 2017, Fair began an altercation with white nationalist [[Richard B. Spencer]] at a gym in [[Alexandria, Virginia]]. While the two were working out, Fair approached Spencer and accused him of being a [[Nazism|Nazi]], along with a number of other accusations, leading a third gym patron to intervene on behalf of him. This incident resulted in Spencer's membership being terminated by the manager of the gym.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html#incart_most-comments|title=Professor confronts white nationalist at the gym - which terminates his membership|date=May 21, 2017|work=[[The Times-Picayune|Nola.com]]|access-date=September 30, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306000842/https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/richard_spencer_gym_professor.html|archive-date=March 6, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


In January 2018, Fair was involved in an incident at [[Frankfurt Airport]] in [[Frankfurt]], [[Germany]]. When her bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives, it was searched and [[Federal Police (Germany)|German Federal Police]] instructed Fair that she would have to dispose of a liquid [[deodorant]] or transfer it to her checked bag. German police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany's [[defamation]] law. She subsequently published an article on ''[[HuffPost]]'' partially rejecting the police account of the incident.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|title=U.S. professor sued for calling a German cop a Nazi claims 'extraordinary corruption'|last=Londberg|first=Max|date=January 26, 2018|work=[[The Kansas City Star]]|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215043305/https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|archive-date=February 15, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>
In January 2018, Fair was involved in an incident at [[Frankfurt Airport]]. When her bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives, it was searched and [[Federal Police (Germany)|German Federal Police]] instructed Fair that she would have to dispose of a liquid [[deodorant]] or transfer it to her checked bag. German police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany's [[defamation]] law. She subsequently published an article on ''[[HuffPost]]'' partially rejecting the police account of the incident.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|title=U.S. professor sued for calling a German cop a Nazi claims 'extraordinary corruption'|last=Londberg|first=Max|date=January 26, 2018|work=[[The Kansas City Star]]|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180215043305/https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/article196872084.html|archive-date=February 15, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref>


In the midst of the [[Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination|Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings]] in September 2018, Fair tweeted that [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] members of the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]] were "entitled white men justifying a serial rapists' arrogated entitlement" and that they "deserve miserable deaths while [[Feminism|feminists]] laugh as they take their last gasps." She made additional comments expressing support for post-mortem [[castration]] and corpse desecration of the senators.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|title=Georgetown prof: White GOP senators in Kavanaugh hearing 'deserve miserable deaths'|last=Marone|first=Abigail|date=September 30, 2018|work=[[Campus Reform]]|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930234421/https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|archive-date=September 30, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> At least one student expressed the fear that Fair's comments would cause students who hold opposing views to feel threatened. [[Georgetown University]] responded by saying that her expressions did not violate the university's policies.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|title=Georgetown professor says white GOP senators 'deserve miserable deaths' after Kavanaugh hearing|last=Parke|first=Caleb|date=October 1, 2018|work=[[Fox News]]|access-date=October 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181001191120/https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|archive-date=October 1, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The university later responded by moving up her scheduled international research leave.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|title=Professor Who Tweeted About 'Castrating the Corpses' of GOP Senators No Longer Teaching|last=Flaherty|first=Colleen|date=October 8, 2018|work=[[Inside Higher Ed]]|access-date=March 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215082408/https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|archive-date=February 15, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>
In the midst of the [[Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination|Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings]] in September 2018, Fair tweeted that [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] members of the [[United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary|Senate Judiciary Committee]] were "entitled white men justifying a serial rapists' arrogated entitlement" and that they "deserve miserable deaths while [[Feminism|feminists]] laugh as they take their last gasps." She made additional comments expressing support for post-mortem [[castration]] and corpse desecration of the senators.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|title=Georgetown prof: White GOP senators in Kavanaugh hearing 'deserve miserable deaths'|last=Marone|first=Abigail|date=September 30, 2018|work=[[Campus Reform]]|access-date=September 30, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180930234421/https://www.campusreform.org/?ID=11369|archive-date=September 30, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> At least one student expressed the fear that Fair's comments would cause students who hold opposing views to feel threatened. Georgetown University responded by saying that her expressions did not violate the university's policies.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|title=Georgetown professor says white GOP senators 'deserve miserable deaths' after Kavanaugh hearing|last=Parke|first=Caleb|date=October 1, 2018|work=[[Fox News]]|access-date=October 1, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181001191120/https://www.foxnews.com/us/georgetown-professor-says-white-gop-senators-deserve-miserable-deaths-after-kavanaugh-hearing|archive-date=October 1, 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The university later responded by moving up her scheduled international research leave.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|title=Professor Who Tweeted About 'Castrating the Corpses' of GOP Senators No Longer Teaching|last=Flaherty|first=Colleen|date=October 8, 2018|work=[[Inside Higher Ed]]|access-date=March 13, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190215082408/https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2018/10/08/professor-who-tweeted-about-castrating-corpses-gop-senators-no-longer-teaching|archive-date=February 15, 2019|url-status=live}}</ref>


Fair has accused the historian [[Dipesh Chakrabarty]] of sexual harassment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/karthikshankar/why-i-published-a-list-of-sexual-predators-in-academia|title=Why I Published A List Of Sexual Predators In Academia|first=Karthik|last=Shankar|website=BuzzFeed}}</ref>
Fair has accused the historian [[Dipesh Chakrabarty]] of sexual harassment.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.buzzfeed.com/karthikshankar/why-i-published-a-list-of-sexual-predators-in-academia|title=Why I Published A List Of Sexual Predators In Academia|first=Karthik|last=Shankar|website=BuzzFeed}}</ref>

Revision as of 15:03, 5 February 2022

C. Christine Fair
C. Christine Fair at New America event "Afghanistan Eight Years On" in 2009
Born
Carol Christine Fair

1968 (age 56–57)
NationalityAmerican
Academic background
Alma materUniversity of Chicago (PhD, MA, BS)
Academic work
InstitutionsGeorgetown University

Carol Christine Fair (born 1968) is an American political scientist. She is an associate professor in the Security Studies Program within the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Her work is primarily focused on counter-terrorism and South Asian topics.[1]

Academic career

Fair received her PhD from the Department of South Asian Languages and Civilization at the University of Chicago in 2004.[2] Previously, she received a masters of arts and Bachelor of Science from the same university.[3]

Fair served as a senior political scientist with the RAND Corporation, political officer with the UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan, and a senior research associate with the United States Institute of Peace. She specializes in political and military affairs in South Asia.[4] She has served as a senior fellow at West Point's Combating Terrorism Center, a senior resident fellow at the Institute of Defense Studies and Analyses (New Delhi), and took a Reagan–Fascell Democracy Fellowship in the spring of 2017.[5]

Fair is a Provost's Distinguished Associate Professor[5] in the Peace and Security Studies Program (SSP) within Georgetown University's Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.[6][7] She has authored or co-authored, and co-edited several books, including Pakistan's Enduring Challenges (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015), Policing Insurgencies: Cops as Counterinsurgents (Oxford University Press, 2014);Political Islam and Governance in Bangladesh (Routledge, 2010); Treading on Hallowed Ground: Counterinsurgency Operations in Sacred Spaces (Oxford University Press, 2008); The Madrassah Challenge: Militancy and Religious Education in Pakistan (USIP, 2008), and Cuisines of the Axis of Evil and Other Irritating States (Globe Pequot, 2008), Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army’s Way of War (Oxford University Press, 2014), In Their Own Words: Understanding the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (Oxford University Press, 2019), among others. Her current book project is Militant Piety and Lines of Control.[8]

Views

Fair has published several articles defending the use of drone strikes in Pakistan and has been critical of analyses by Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and other humanitarian organizations, arguing that drone strikes are accurate, have reduced casualties, have targeted Taliban leadership, and are popular among some Pakistanis.[9]

Academic controversies

Fair's work and viewpoints have been the subject of criticism.[10] In 2015, journalist Glenn Greenwald dismissed Fair's arguments in support of drone strikes as "rank propaganda", arguing there are "enormous amounts of evidence" showing drones are counterproductive, pointing to mass civilian casualties and independent studies.[11] Commenting on her debate with Greenwald, Brookings Institution senior fellow Shadi Hamid called Fair's arguments "surprisingly weak".[10] In 2010, Fair denied the notion that drones caused any civilian deaths, alleging Pakistani media reports were responsible for creating this perception.[12] Jeremy Scahill wrote that Fair's statement was "simply false" and contradicted by New America's detailed study on drone casualties.[12] Fair later said that casualties are caused by the UAVs, but maintains they are the most effective tool for fighting terrorism.[13]

Writing for The Atlantic, Conor Friedersdorf challenged Fair's co-authored narrative that the U.S. could legitimize support in Pakistan for its drone program using 'education' and 'public diplomacy'; he called it an "example of interventionist hubris and naivete" built upon flawed interpretation of public opinion data.[14] An article in the Middle East Research and Information Project called the work "some of the most propagandistic writing in support of President Barack Obama’s targeted kill lists to date."[15] It censured the view that Pakistanis needed to be informed by the U.S. what is "good for them" as fraught with imperialist condescension; or the assumption that the Urdu press was less informed than the English press – because the latter was sometimes less critical of the U.S.[15]

Fair's journalistic sources have been questioned for their credibility[16] and she has been accused of having a conflict of interest due to her past work with U.S. government think tanks, as well as the CIA.[10] In 2011 and 2012, she received funding from the U.S. embassy in Islamabad to conduct a survey on public opinion concerning militancy. However, Fair states most of the grants went to a survey firm and that it had no influence on her research.[10] Pakistani media analysts have dismissed Fair's views as hawkish rhetoric, riddled with factual inaccuracies, lack of objectivity, and being selectively biased.[16][17][18][19] She has also been rebuked[by whom?] for comments on social media perceived as provocative, such as suggesting burning down Pakistan's embassy in Afghanistan or asking India to "squash Pakistan militarily, diplomatically, politically and economically."[citation needed] She has been accused of double standards, partisanship towards India, and has been criticized for her contacts with dissident leaders from Balochistan, a link which they claim "raises serious questions if her interest in Pakistan is merely academic."[18]

Personal controversies

In January 2017, Fair was involved in a Twitter dispute with Asra Q. Nomani. In response to Nomani's tweet that as a Muslim, she voted for President Trump, Fair tweeted that she had "written [Nomani] off as a human being" and that Nomani had "pimped herself out to all media outlets." Nomani responded by filing a complaint with Georgetown University, Fair's employer, alleging discrimination and harassment.[20]

In May 2017, Fair began an altercation with white nationalist Richard B. Spencer at a gym in Alexandria, Virginia. While the two were working out, Fair approached Spencer and accused him of being a Nazi, along with a number of other accusations, leading a third gym patron to intervene on behalf of him. This incident resulted in Spencer's membership being terminated by the manager of the gym.[21]

In January 2018, Fair was involved in an incident at Frankfurt Airport. When her bag was flagged for possibly containing explosives, it was searched and German Federal Police instructed Fair that she would have to dispose of a liquid deodorant or transfer it to her checked bag. German police stated that Fair was uncooperative, as she accused them of sexism and of being Nazis and thugs, and directed expletives at them. Fair was charged with slander under Germany's defamation law. She subsequently published an article on HuffPost partially rejecting the police account of the incident.[22]

In the midst of the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination hearings in September 2018, Fair tweeted that Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were "entitled white men justifying a serial rapists' arrogated entitlement" and that they "deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps." She made additional comments expressing support for post-mortem castration and corpse desecration of the senators.[23] At least one student expressed the fear that Fair's comments would cause students who hold opposing views to feel threatened. Georgetown University responded by saying that her expressions did not violate the university's policies.[24] The university later responded by moving up her scheduled international research leave.[25]

Fair has accused the historian Dipesh Chakrabarty of sexual harassment.[26]

Works

Books
  • Cuisines of the Axis of Evil and Other Irritating States: A Dinner Party Approach to International Relations (The Lyons Press, 2008). ISBN 978-1599212869.
  • Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War (Oxford University Press, 2014). ISBN 978-0-19-989271-6.[27][28]
  • In Their Own Words: Understanding Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (Oxford University Press, 2019).
Edited collections
Research reports
  • Limited Conflicts Under the Nuclear Umbrella: Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis (with Ashley J. Tellis and Jamison Jo Medby, RAND, 2002). ISBN 978-0-8330-3229-4.
  • The Counterterror Coalitions: Cooperation with Pakistan and India (RAND, 2004). ISBN 978-0-8330-3559-2.
  • Urban Battle Fields of South Asia: Lessons Learned from Sri Lanka, India, and Pakistan (RAND, 2005). ISBN 978-0-8330-4058-9.
  • Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance (with Peter Chalk, US Institute of Peace Press, 2006). ISBN 978-1-929223-88-6.[30][31]
  • The Madrassah Challenge: Militancy and Religious Education in Pakistan (US Institute of Peace Press, 2008). ISBN 978-1-60127-028-3.[32]
  • Counterinsurgency in Pakistan (with Seth G. Jones, RAND 2010). ISBN 978-0-8330-4976-6.

References

  1. ^ "India's Move in Kashmir: Unpacking the Domestic and International Motivations and Implications". Lawfare. August 12, 2019.
  2. ^ "Carol Christine Fair". ResearchGate. Archived from the original on November 21, 2016. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  3. ^ "Carol C Fair". Georgetown University. Archived from the original on September 23, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  4. ^ Author information, Oxford University Press, retrieved September 6, 2016.
  5. ^ a b "2016-2017 Distinguished Associate Professors". provost.georgetown.edu. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  6. ^ "C. Christine Fair". Georgetown University academic directory. Retrieved June 27, 2016.
  7. ^ C. Christine, Fair (September 25, 2009). "For Now, Drones Are the Best Option". The New York Times. Retrieved June 28, 2016.
  8. ^ Fair, C. Christine. "C. Christine Fair". www.christinefair.net. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  9. ^ Fair, C. Christine (October 6, 2014). "Ethical and methodological issues in assessing drones' civilian impacts in Pakistan". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  10. ^ a b c d Norton, Ben (November 4, 2015). "Not playing fair: How Christine Fair, defender of U.S. drone program in Pakistan, twists the facts — and may have conflicts of her own". Salon. Retrieved November 4, 2015.
  11. ^ "Do drone strikes create more terrorists than they kill?". Al Jazeera. October 23, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  12. ^ a b Scahill, Jeremy (May 10, 2010). "Georgetown Professor: 'Drones Are Not Killing Innocent Civilians' in Pakistan". The Nation. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  13. ^ Shane, Scott (August 11, 2011). "C.I.A. Is Disputed on Civilian Toll in Drone Strikes". The New York Times. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  14. ^ Friedersdorf, Conor (January 24, 2013). "Yes, Pakistanis Really Do Hate America's Killer Drones". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  15. ^ a b Waheed, Sarah (January 25, 2013). "Drones, US Propaganda and Imperial Hubris". Middle East Research and Information Project. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  16. ^ a b Ahmad, Muhammad Idrees (June 14, 2011). "The magical realism of body counts". Al Jazeera. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  17. ^ Haider, Murtaza (June 27, 2012). "An unFair comment". Dawn. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  18. ^ a b "US professor's anti-Pak agenda?". The News. February 7, 2016. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  19. ^ Chandio, Khalid (May 6, 2015). Prejudice Dominates Christine Discourse. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  20. ^ Moyer, Justin Wm. (January 6, 2017). "Muslim woman who voted for Trump asks Georgetown to intervene over professor's 'hateful, vulgar' messages". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 5, 2018.
  21. ^ "Professor confronts white nationalist at the gym - which terminates his membership". Nola.com. May 21, 2017. Archived from the original on March 6, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2017.
  22. ^ Londberg, Max (January 26, 2018). "U.S. professor sued for calling a German cop a Nazi claims 'extraordinary corruption'". The Kansas City Star. Archived from the original on February 15, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  23. ^ Marone, Abigail (September 30, 2018). "Georgetown prof: White GOP senators in Kavanaugh hearing 'deserve miserable deaths'". Campus Reform. Archived from the original on September 30, 2018. Retrieved September 30, 2018.
  24. ^ Parke, Caleb (October 1, 2018). "Georgetown professor says white GOP senators 'deserve miserable deaths' after Kavanaugh hearing". Fox News. Archived from the original on October 1, 2018. Retrieved October 1, 2018.
  25. ^ Flaherty, Colleen (October 8, 2018). "Professor Who Tweeted About 'Castrating the Corpses' of GOP Senators No Longer Teaching". Inside Higher Ed. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved March 13, 2019.
  26. ^ Shankar, Karthik. "Why I Published A List Of Sexual Predators In Academia". BuzzFeed.
  27. ^ Adeney, Katherine (2015), "Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War by C. Christine Fair (Book Review)", Political Studies Review, 13: 623–624, doi:10.1111/1478-9302.12101_97, S2CID 220081520
  28. ^ Shaikh, Farzana (2015), "Fighting to the end: the Pakistan army's way of war, by C. Christine Fair (Book review)", International Affairs, 91 (3): 665–667, doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12313
  29. ^ Ghorpade, Yashodhan (2014), "C. Christine Fair and Shaun Gregory (Eds). Pakistan in National and Regional Change: State and Society in Flux (Book Review)", Journal of South Asian Development, 9 (1): 91–97, doi:10.1177/0973174113520586, S2CID 147279244
  30. ^ Argon, Kemal (September 2008), "Reviewed Work: Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance by C. Christine Fair, Peter Chalk", International Journal on World Peace, 25 (3): 120–123, JSTOR 20752852
  31. ^ Rizvi, Hasan-Askari (September 2008), "Fortifying Pakistan: The Role of U.S. Internal Security Assistance, by C. Christine Fair and Peter Chalk (eds) (BOok review)", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 16 (3): 169–170, doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00546.x
  32. ^ Schaffer, Teresita C. (October 2008), "Book Reviews: South Asia", Survival, 50 (5): 195–215, doi:10.1080/00396330802456536, S2CID 219642865