Talk:Neodymium: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:48, 8 February 2022

Neodymium is currently a Chemistry and materials science good article nominee. Nominated by Bli231957 (talk) at 12:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Template:Vital article

Elements B‑class High‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

"Tyrium" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tyrium. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21#Tyrium until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Neodymium

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Neodymium's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Greenwood1229":

From Cerium: Greenwood and Earnshaw, pp. 1229–1232
From Praseodymium: Greenwood and Earnshaw, p. 1229–32

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Bli231957 (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Article probably needs more cleanup, and also deal with the images sandwiching. If the issues wasn't fixed, then some reviewer at GAN will most likely quick fail it. 2001:4455:364:A800:75C8:6EE4:66A9:382A (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have just fixed this issue, thanks for noting it! Bli231957 (talk) 20:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#880">⚡</span>]] 06:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
+Done! [[User:Bli231957|Bli231957]] ([[User talk:Bli231957|talk]]) 20:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 == Images ==