Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opontia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Adil Faouzi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Arab Emirates|list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Arab Emirates|list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 09:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''': I don't think there is a problem with this article, as it contains a good number of references given its size, and the company's name has been circulated in a number of press articles, it has a profile on [[Crunchbase]] and [[CB Insights]], and it has also been mentioned on Forbes Middle East's 50 Most-Funded Startups, and this, in my opinion, makes it achieve sufficient notability. If we are going to delete this article, then we have to delete thousands of articles like it that do not even meet the minimum standards.-[[User:Adil Faouzi|Adil Faouzi]] ([[User talk:Adil Faouzi|talk]]) 18:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''': I don't think there is a problem with this article, as it contains a good number of references given its size, and the company's name has been circulated in a number of press articles, it has a profile on [[Crunchbase]] and [[CB Insights]], and it has also been mentioned on Forbes Middle East's 50 Most-Funded Startups, and this, in my opinion, makes it achieve sufficient notability. If we are going to delete this article, then we have to delete thousands of articles like it that do not even meet the minimum standards.-[[User:Adil Faouzi|Adil Faouzi]] ([[User talk:Adil Faouzi|talk]]) 18:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''': 2 Articles in [[TechCrunch]], one in [[Reuters]], one in [https://hbrturkiye.com/roportaj/dogru-yatirim-stratejileri-ile-kuresel-pazarlara-acilmak-mumkun Harvard Business Review (Turkish version)], that is pretty significant. There are several in-depth articles too, even tough mostly foreign press, they appear reliable. [[User:Caphadouk|Caphadouk]] ([[User talk:Caphadouk|talk]]) 22:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:35, 9 February 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Opontia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. All we have are the current sources which seem limited to press releases and their rewrites about company securing funding and doing some investments. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: I don't think there is a problem with this article, as it contains a good number of references given its size, and the company's name has been circulated in a number of press articles, it has a profile on Crunchbase and CB Insights, and it has also been mentioned on Forbes Middle East's 50 Most-Funded Startups, and this, in my opinion, makes it achieve sufficient notability. If we are going to delete this article, then we have to delete thousands of articles like it that do not even meet the minimum standards.-Adil Faouzi (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: 2 Articles in TechCrunch, one in Reuters, one in Harvard Business Review (Turkish version), that is pretty significant. There are several in-depth articles too, even tough mostly foreign press, they appear reliable. Caphadouk (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)