Talk:Bee: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:07, 11 February 2022

Bee has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 16, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bee article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Insects: Hymenoptera High‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as Top-importance).

Template:WP1.0

There is a request, submitted by 92.18.164.107 (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "important subject".

A fact from Bee appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that as flowers developed longer tubes, bees (pictured) coevolved by developing longer tongues to extract the nectar?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bee.

Wikipedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexa-playjonimitchell.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bee Subclass Pterygota

I think that it would be good to add the subclass Pterygota in the scientific classification of the bee on the sidebar. Also, the taxon Dicondylia could also be added. Since I just created my account for this change, I thought I would put this in talk instead of submitting an edit request. I also thought that since I am new to Wikipedia editing, there might be an obvious reason it is not included -- AnonymousCornCob (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That would add zero information of any relevance. All insects that are not either Archaeognatha or Zygentoma are in both Dicondylia and Pterygota. There are no articles in Wikipedia for major insect orders in these groups that includes these ranks in their visible classification, for this exact reason. If it doesn't merit inclusion in the articles for insect orders, it certain doesn't merit inclusion for a taxon as far down the hierarchy as a superfamily, and bees are an even lower rank than that. Putting this information into every article for every group of insects down to the rank of superfamily would require hundreds upon hundreds of edits. Dyanega (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Global Patterns and Drivers of Bee Distribution

2020 study in Current Biology Mapsax (talk) 22:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talgat

talgat is good — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.235.20.238 (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hailey

Gig 2600:1700:D130:20B0:A8F9:91A:F225:C18 (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 talgat is good  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/77.235.20.238|77.235.20.238]] ([[User talk:77.235.20.238#top|talk]]) 05:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Hailey ==
+Gig [[Special:Contributions/2600:1700:D130:20B0:A8F9:91A:F225:C18|2600:1700:D130:20B0:A8F9:91A:F225:C18]] ([[User talk:2600:1700:D130:20B0:A8F9:91A:F225:C18|talk]]) 01:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)