Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolf Boy: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:32, 11 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Any userfication request can be directed to my talk page. Thanks. Wifione ^Message 04:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wolf Boy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is not notable, the film has not even been released yet. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 17:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy incubate as per WP:IAR, as notability cannot be assessed at this time. Unscintillating (talk) 05:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 02:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy to the userspace of anyone willing to take it. This film may well become notable in the future, but without knowing when it will be released it's hard to assess it yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it fails WP:NFF. I have been unable to find any proof that principal photography has commenced yet. No prejudice towards recreation once principal photography commences and can be verified. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 17:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 *'''Userfy''' to the userspace of anyone willing to take it. This film may well become notable in the future, but without knowing when it will be released it's hard to assess it yet. --[[User:Metropolitan90|Metropolitan90]] [[User talk:Metropolitan90|(talk)]] 03:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' as it fails [[WP:NFF]]. I have been unable to find any proof that principal photography has commenced yet. No prejudice towards recreation once principal photography commences and can be verified. [[User:Big Bird|Big Bird]] <small>([[User talk:Big Bird|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Big Bird|contribs]])</small> 17:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>