Talk:Media art history: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:41, 12 February 2022

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

History Start‑class

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copied discussion from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Page_to_watch

Copied from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts to continue discussion. freshacconci talk to me 14:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Media Art Histories was created in late 2015. I'd never noticed it but I recently saw a posting on facebook announcing its creation. Full disclosure, I'm part of that facebook group and this is an area of research I'm engaged in (in real life). If you can't follow the link, it says: "Welcome to the new MEDIA ART HISTORIES Wikipedia page, your reference portal for exploring the interdisciplinary research into NEW MEDIA ART!"

I'm going to guess that it's mostly harmless, but the page itself has many problems (WP:OR, tone, etc). Others may want to stop by and help out. I don't believe it warrants deletion, although a name change to Media art history (singular, lowercase) may be best. I think it's a valid topic but the page needs more work than I can devote at this time. My main worry is that it may devolve into POV issues and more original research by well-meaning editors who may not understand how Wikipedia works and it currently is probably not on too many watchlists. freshacconci talk to me 17:55, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help out, but the situation is confusing. Cubitt and Thomas (Relive: Media Art Histories) and Grau (MediaArtHistories) both use the term "Media Art Histories" and not "Media art history", in their book titles, but are signatory to the manifesto that refers to the field as "Media art history". So, which is it, and why is one more authoritative than the other? Mduvekot (talk) 18:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Visual arts |class=Start}}
 {{WikiProject History |class=Start}}
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Ottawa/CMN2160B_(Winter) | assignments = [[User:Yingzhuo Yang|Yingzhuo Yang]] | start_date = 2022-01-12 | end_date = 2022-04-06 }}
 == Copied discussion from [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Visual_arts#Page_to_watch]] ==