Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Angelica Behn: Difference between revisions
CAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs) Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:{{la|1=Maud Angelica Behn}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Angelica Behn|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 13#{{anchorencode:Maud Angelica Behn}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1071633071/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
:{{la|1=Maud Angelica Behn}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Angelica Behn|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 13#{{anchorencode:Maud Angelica Behn}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1071633071/cur|edits since nomination]]) |
||
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Maud Angelica Behn}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Maud Angelica Behn}}) |
||
Contrary to what was said upon the recreation of the |
Contrary to what was said upon the recreation of the articles, the Behn girls are expressly ''not'' "core members" of the Norwegian royal family. Not even their mother is. The girls bear no titles and have no public role. They are [[WP:LOWPROFILE|low profile]] teenagers. The only reason we have these articles is that their mother is the daughter of a king, but [[WP:NOTINHERITED|notability is not inherited]]. According to [[WP:INVALIDBIO]], "that person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A". For them to be considered notable, they have to have attracted [[WP:SIGCOV|''significant'' coverage]] in ''reliable'' sources, but the truth is that they do not get more than passing references in reliable sources when their parents or another actually prominent relative are discussed. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Royalty and nobility|list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Royalty and nobility|list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Norway|list of Norway-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Norway|list of Norway-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Surtsicna|Surtsicna]] ([[User talk:Surtsicna|talk]]) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
Revision as of 17:29, 13 February 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maud Angelica Behn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contrary to what was said upon the recreation of the articles, the Behn girls are expressly not "core members" of the Norwegian royal family. Not even their mother is. The girls bear no titles and have no public role. They are low profile teenagers. The only reason we have these articles is that their mother is the daughter of a king, but notability is not inherited. According to WP:INVALIDBIO, "that person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A". For them to be considered notable, they have to have attracted significant coverage in reliable sources, but the truth is that they do not get more than passing references in reliable sources when their parents or another actually prominent relative are discussed. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)