Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Angelica Behn: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:48, 14 February 2022

Maud Angelica Behn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contrary to what was said upon the recreation of the articles, the Behn girls are expressly not "core members" of the Norwegian royal family. Not even their mother is. See the official website. Consequently, the girls bear no titles and have no public role. They are low profile teenagers. The only reason we have these articles is that their mother is the daughter of a king, but notability is not inherited. According to WP:INVALIDBIO, "that person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A". For them to be considered notable, they have to have attracted significant coverage in reliable sources, but the truth is that they do not get more than passing references in reliable sources when their parents or another actually prominent relative are discussed. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thank you for notifying me of the AfD. The acid test here is WP:N, and the test is surely met. Notability is not about importance, but the subject is listed on the web site of the royal family as one of the small number of members of the family, anyone who doubts that has only to follow the link helpfully provided above. Could this information please not be deleted from the article again? It seems pretty unlikely that any member of a reigning royal family is non-notable. But the correct approach to this is whether there is substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, and there is. Moonraker (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leah Isadora Behn

A header at Leah Isadora Behn says that article is being considered for deletion, but the link provided leads here instead. If this page is treated as an AfD for that page too, then I say Keep for the same reasons. Please could I be notified if another AfD is in fact begun? Moonraker (talk) 01:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Keep''' Thank you for notifying me of the AfD. The acid test here is [[WP:N]], and the test is surely met. Notability is not about importance, but the subject is listed on the web site of the royal family as one of the small number of members of the family, anyone who doubts that has only to follow the link helpfully provided above. Could this information please not be deleted from the article again? It seems pretty unlikely that any member of a reigning royal family is non-notable. But the correct approach to this is whether there is substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, and there is. [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 01:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
+==Leah Isadora Behn==
+A header at [[Leah Isadora Behn]] says that article is being considered for deletion, but the link provided leads here instead. If this page is treated as an AfD for that page too, then I say '''Keep''' for the same reasons. Please could I be notified if another AfD is in fact begun? [[User:Moonraker|Moonraker]] ([[User talk:Moonraker|talk]]) 01:48, 14 February 2022 (UTC)