Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold H. Buls: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Asilvering (talk | contribs) delete |
Paulstar57 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Kazakhstan|list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Kazakhstan|list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''. Looks like he and his notes on various Bible verses are reasonably well-known among Lutheran ministers, but until one of them writes a biography on him or collects those notes into an edited volume, it doesn't look like there are any sources for us to use to ''say'' that. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 00:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Looks like he and his notes on various Bible verses are reasonably well-known among Lutheran ministers, but until one of them writes a biography on him or collects those notes into an edited volume, it doesn't look like there are any sources for us to use to ''say'' that. -- [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 00:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' He would have to pass through [[WP:GNC]] as he fails all [[WP:NACADEMIC]] criteria considerably. That being said he does not pass [[WP:GNC]] with the article in its current form. |
|||
Revision as of 05:57, 14 February 2022
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harold H. Buls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Low to no citations on his academic work, and no independent coverage found. I'm sure he was a fine professor, but he's just not notable. schetm (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like he and his notes on various Bible verses are reasonably well-known among Lutheran ministers, but until one of them writes a biography on him or collects those notes into an edited volume, it doesn't look like there are any sources for us to use to say that. -- asilvering (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete He would have to pass through WP:GNC as he fails all WP:NACADEMIC criteria considerably. That being said he does not pass WP:GNC with the article in its current form.