Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cucumber in Sauce: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 11:31, 14 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. unsourced, no indication of notability, not a cookbook Jimfbleak (talk) 06:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cucumber in Sauce

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a cook book. GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator and completely unsourced. Meatsgains (talk) 15:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete: WP is not a cookbook and even if sourced I cannot see this being notable; it is just a way of cooking vegetables, not a well known dish or distinctive technique.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete: while individual dishes certainly can be notable and there many examples of good articles about them, there isn't anything here worth keeping. Jonathunder (talk) 16:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * '''delete''': while individual dishes certainly can be notable and there many examples of good articles about them, there isn't anything here worth keeping. [[User:Jonathunder|Jonathunder]] ([[User talk:Jonathunder|talk]]) 16:47, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 {{clear}}
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>