Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kdetoys: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:35, 15 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kdetoys

Bringing this here for discussion because there seem to be a lot of similar articles (see the info box in this one). KDE is notable, but I don't find evidence the individual programs are. Ghits abound but they're forums and installation information, nothing that establishes notability and there's no RS coverage. I hate to do a large bundle, but I think some consensus on this would be beneficial. Thoughts? _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 16:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 08:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I found no reliable sources in the first 100 results of my google search, and nothing to make me think there would be any hope in the remaining sources. Lots of source code indexes, download directories, indices and the like but no reviews, et cetera. GRBerry 19:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete KDE has gewgaws, but so does every other desktop. NN and unreferenced. --Thetrick (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Anything of note in this collection – and I don't see anything – should be in the KDE article. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:RS. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 02:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Revision as of 03:01, 20 June 2008 edit TimVickers (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 58,184 edits delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:35, 15 February 2022 edit undo MalnadachBot (talk \| contribs) 11,637,095 edits m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) Tag: AWB Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Masterpiece2000\|<font color="green">Masterpiece2000</font>]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000\|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 02:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' Fails [[WP:RS]]. [[User:Masterpiece2000\|<font color="green">Masterpiece2000</font>]] ([[User talk:Masterpiece2000\|<font color="green">talk</font>]]) 02:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>		:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review\|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>