Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual filing cabinet: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:54, 15 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:46, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual filing cabinet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert for non-notable product. Has already had a prod declined, hence AfD. Tagishsimon (talk) 18:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, two of the three sources are press releases that say right on the page they're user-generated - David Gerard (talk) 18:39, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:24, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete yes, seems like one of many projects that did not last through the recession that came fairly quickly after it. It looks like the company now sells something called InfoFlow, but that also does not seem to meet notability thresholds. W Nowicki (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom. History shows article created by SPA with no other edits in the past 8 years. Clearly COI/promotional intent. MB 17:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as "corporate spam"; nothing else there. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *'''Delete''' as "corporate spam"; nothing else there. [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 01:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 {{clear}}
-:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>