Talk:Ghostery: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Ghostery/Archives/2019. (BOT) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{oldafdfull| date = 10 June 2011 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Ghostery }} |
{{oldafdfull| date = 10 June 2011 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Ghostery }} |
||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Ghostery/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Ghostery/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== [[Free and open-source software]], [[Mozilla Public License]], and Ghostery's [[end-user license agreement]] == |
|||
Currently, Ghostery is [https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-extension/blob/master/LICENSE licensed] under the [[Mozilla Public License]] 2.0. Although their website hosts an [https://www.ghostery.com/about-ghostery/browser-extension-end-user-license-agreement/ end user license agreement], that page is not presented to users prior to installation, and users are not given an opportunity to read or accept it. Ghostery is also hosted in the extension directories of supported browsers (e.g. [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ghostery/ Firefox Add-ons], [https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ghostery-%E2%80%93-privacy-ad-blo/mlomiejdfkolichcflejclcbmpeaniij Chrome Web Store], [https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/ghostery-privacy-ad-blocker/9nblggh52ngz Microsoft Store], [https://addons.opera.com/en/extensions/details/ghostery/ Opera add-ons]). Among these listings, the Firefox add-on explicitly states that Ghostery is licensed under the MPL 2.0 (with no mention of the EULA), and the other listings don't comment on licensing. Additionally, Ghostery offers direct downloads of their browser extensions through their [https://github.com/ghostery/ghostery-extension/releases GitHub releases page]. That page is linked to their repository, which mentions only the MPL 2.0 and not the EULA. |
|||
Altogether, since the EULA appears to be unused while the MPL 2.0 licensing is prominently displayed, both Ghostery's source code and binaries appear to be [[free and open-source software]] licensed under the MPL 2.0. — '''''[[User:Newslinger|<span style="color:#536267;">Newslinger</span>]]''' <small>[[User talk:Newslinger#top|<span style="color:#708090;">talk</span>]]</small>'' 07:35, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion == |
== A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion == |
Revision as of 17:15, 18 February 2022
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 10 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Ghostery Lite
For the current version of Safari, they make available only Ghostery Lite. We should have an entry on this. On what is missing. It still claims to offer "comprehensive privacy protection". -IP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8381:99C0:8071:38EE:1DF5:DAFA (talk) 18:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Unsubstantiated severe claim in criticism section since at least 2015
This was brought up already in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ghostery/Archives/2015#Criticism_Section and still applies.
In the Criticism section, one sentence reads: "GhostRank [...] sent that information back to advertisers so they could better formulate their ads to avoid being blocked.[20]" (Emphasis mine.)
The first part is as far as I know uncontested, the second has been contradicted by the makers many, many times, is not further qualified, explained or supported in any way in the referenced article and is basically unsubstantiated conjecture.
(I am not affiliated with the company or the extension and haven't used it in years because I don't need it and am uncomfortable with their affiliations, even if I personally don't think they're immoral.)
--2003:C9:4711:4B00:A0D9:D261:9830:FF1B (talk) 12:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- Start-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- Start-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- Start-Class Free and open-source software articles
- Mid-importance Free and open-source software articles
- Start-Class Free and open-source software articles of Mid-importance
- All Free and open-source software articles
- All Computing articles