Whitus v. Georgia: Difference between revisions
Whilding87 (talk | contribs) m I used the terminology used by the courts and all references; replacing with better stub |
Whilding87 (talk | contribs) m Sp |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''''Whitus v. Georgia''''', [[Case citation|385 U.S. 545]] (1967), found in favor of the [[plaintiff]] (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions. This was due to the [[Georgia]] [[jury selection]] policies; in which it was alleged racial discrimination had occurred. |
'''''Whitus v. Georgia''''', [[Case citation|385 U.S. 545]] (1967), found in favor of the [[plaintiff]] (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions. This was due to the [[Georgia]] [[jury selection]] policies; in which it was alleged racial discrimination had occurred. |
||
The plaintiffs argued that, as their |
The plaintiffs argued that, as their county had a 45% population of african-Americans, it was discrimination and unfair to have been presented with all-white or nearly all-white juries each time. Thus, the Supreme Court - as well as overturning the convictions - ruled that Georgia renew it's jury selection policies. Previous law meant tax returns would be sorted, and "Negroes" would have a '(c)' placed next to their name. In the conviction of Whitus, the jury had been selected via old lists. |
||
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
{{SCOTUS-case-stub}} |
||
Revision as of 15:05, 11 February 2007
| Whitus v. Georgia | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 7, 1966 Decided January 23, 1967 | |
| Full case name | Whitus v. Georgia |
| Citations | 385 U.S. 545 (more) 385 U.S. 545 |
| Holding | |
| Convictions cannot stand if based on indictments or verdicts of juries on which racial discrimination has occurred. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 (1967), found in favor of the plaintiff (Whitus), who had been convicted for murder, and as such reversed their convictions. This was due to the Georgia jury selection policies; in which it was alleged racial discrimination had occurred.
The plaintiffs argued that, as their county had a 45% population of african-Americans, it was discrimination and unfair to have been presented with all-white or nearly all-white juries each time. Thus, the Supreme Court - as well as overturning the convictions - ruled that Georgia renew it's jury selection policies. Previous law meant tax returns would be sorted, and "Negroes" would have a '(c)' placed next to their name. In the conviction of Whitus, the jury had been selected via old lists.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |