Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathis Gamme: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:16, 21 February 2022

Mathis Gamme

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Can't find anything online that supports notability in any way. Cross-wiki attempt to promote this person. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:21, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Could be promotional as well. He is referencing instagram posts. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 11:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The following comment was left by the article's creator, Alpaca5000, on the talk page of this discussion page; moving here as a courtesyGirth Summit_(blether) 18:25, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Instagram mentions have been deleted from the article.
- I have been trying to write an article for this person for sometimes now and I assure you this article stays neutral without promoting anything

Delete as I see no reliable piece of source. Instagram, Spotify can not be the sources to support notability. --NeverTry4Me - TT Page 22:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For analysis regarding the recent additions to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON; everything seems to come down to spotify, twitter etc. Elemimele (talk) 14:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Elemimele. --Vaco98 (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article seems to consist entirely of references to self-published sources, and reads promotionally. RoseCherry64 (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is true the article seems to have been written by someone close to the person, thus looks a bit promotional. However I reckon the creator did somewhat a good job and the article doesn't deserve to be deleted, in my opinion. Information is in most cases correct, a lot of things were easy to be verified. But changes have to be made, the article gives too many details I am still not able to confirm as "true" after some researches I did online. Loganinheaven (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 *'''Delete''' per [[User:Elemimele|Elemimele]]. --[[User:Vaco98|Vaco98]] ([[User talk:Vaco98|talk]]) 16:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Article seems to consist entirely of references to self-published sources, and reads promotionally. [[User:RoseCherry64|RoseCherry64]] ([[User talk:RoseCherry64|talk]]) 19:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' It is true the article seems to have been written by someone close to the person, thus looks a bit promotional. However I reckon the creator did somewhat a good job and the article doesn't deserve to be deleted, in my opinion. Information is in most cases correct, a lot of things were easy to be verified. But changes have to be made, the article gives too many details I am still not able to confirm as "true" after some researches I did online. [[User:Loganinheaven|Loganinheaven]] ([[User talk:Loganinheaven|talk]]) 23:41, 21 February 2022 (UTC)