Talk:Supply chain management: Difference between revisions
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
: Nobody has given their opinion on this issue for three weeks. Under normal Wikipedia circumstances, the merge will happen, but in the case of this article, there has been so much more content added to it since the proposal of the merger. The new content added veers away from the tone and issue that prompted this merger. In my opinion the merger is no longer appropriate. Therefore, I will rescind the proposal. Remember, the merger can be proposed again by anyone who wishes to do so. --[[User:Emana|Emana]] 17:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
: Nobody has given their opinion on this issue for three weeks. Under normal Wikipedia circumstances, the merge will happen, but in the case of this article, there has been so much more content added to it since the proposal of the merger. The new content added veers away from the tone and issue that prompted this merger. In my opinion the merger is no longer appropriate. Therefore, I will rescind the proposal. Remember, the merger can be proposed again by anyone who wishes to do so. --[[User:Emana|Emana]] 17:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
SCM solutions are many. Which one is better and Why? SAP or i2 |
|||
SCM solutions are many. Which one is better and Why? |
|||
== SAP == |
== SAP == |
Revision as of 18:21, 11 February 2007
Bold textOBJECTIVES OF SCM
Optimization of supply chain
Decision phases of SCM
---Design Phase ---Planning Level ---Operational Phase
Automation of each event in SCM
Proposed merge from Supply chain event management
Any comments on the proposal? - N (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- No arguments against, so I am merging. --Ezeu 22:18, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
any suggestion on where to get used book for CPIM certification
Proposed merge with Bullwhip effect
This seems like a particular side effect or subtopic of Supply chain management not critical to the topic itself. It seems like merging it would simply diminish interest in the subtopic. I would be opposed to merging. Avt tor 16:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I would oppose merging it too. Besides diluting the topic, I think Bullwhip Effect should be discussed by itself and the importance conveyed. There are other spin-offs of SCM similar to Bullwhip Effect which would then be qualified to enter this article. Nshuks7 08:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- I also oppose merging the Bullwhip Effect page with the general page for supply chain management. The bullwhip effect is important enough to warrant its own entry in wikipedia, yet it is not so central to the field that it warrants inclusion on the SCM page. Sonicace 03:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Merge from Supply chain diversification
A merge from Supply chain diversification has been proposed. This proposal comes after the proposal to have the said article merged with the article on Procurement in wich I voted against, but suggested considering the merger with this article instead. The tone of the two articles seem non-cohesive, probably because the point of view is of management v.s. operations. I would like to get some imput on this merger. --Emana 17:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nobody has given their opinion on this issue for three weeks. Under normal Wikipedia circumstances, the merge will happen, but in the case of this article, there has been so much more content added to it since the proposal of the merger. The new content added veers away from the tone and issue that prompted this merger. In my opinion the merger is no longer appropriate. Therefore, I will rescind the proposal. Remember, the merger can be proposed again by anyone who wishes to do so. --Emana 17:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
SCM solutions are many. Which one is better and Why? SAP or i2
SAP
or
i2
or somthing else —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.128.181.120 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC).