Jump to content

Talk:WWII in HD: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.1)
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
Line 10: Line 10:


The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/108.202.62.77|108.202.62.77]] ([[User talk:108.202.62.77|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex
The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/108.202.62.77|108.202.62.77]] ([[User talk:108.202.62.77|talk]]) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex
::Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
::Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --[[User:doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">do</span>]][[User talk:Doncram|<span style="color:green;">ncr</span>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">am</span>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


==GOCEreviewed==
==GOCEreviewed==
Line 20: Line 20:
To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{tl|more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO.
To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{tl|more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO.


In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --[[User:doncram|<font color="maroon">do</font>]][[User talk:Doncram|<font color="green">ncr</font>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<font color="maroon">am</font>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --[[User:doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">do</span>]][[User talk:Doncram|<span style="color:green;">ncr</span>]][[Special:Contributions/doncram|<span style="color:maroon;">am</span>]] 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 14:08, 27 February 2022

WikiProject iconTelevision Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: War films / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
War films task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
Taskforce icon
World War II task force

Forum

It's impossible to watch the series online here in Israel!!! Absolutely outrageous.

Lt. Charles Scheffel

The section on Lt. Scheffel described him as "an amazing man and soldier." This appears to have been done by a family member or family friend. While I respect that opinion, it constitutes editorializing and is not neutral. 108.202.62.77 (talk) 08:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Alex[reply]

Followup: the treatment of Charles Scheffel was revised sometime during last three years and there is no longer a problem that way. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GOCEreviewed

As well as dealing with the tags on the page, the empty sections should be completed before it's worth copy editing this. --Stfg (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Development by watchers

The series is available in Netflix currently (January 2015). Not sure if that can/should be noted in article.

To me, the article's topic is clearly notable, and the article is really pretty good. I removed several negative tags that seem not to apply (maybe the article was improved since 2010), and replaced just by one: {{more footnotes}} (which calls for inline citations). Further development is not hugely needed, IMHO.

In general, can watchers of the TV series cite the series itself? The TV episodes themselves are sources, should be as legitimate as printed sources. Obviously they are primary sources of info about what the episodes contain, but primary sources can be used, with care, in Wikipedia. I think informed watchers/viewers should be able to generalize from the episodes themselves, though I am not sure how that is done in other articles. --doncram 21:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WWII in HD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]