User talk:ReferenceSF

Welcome!

Hi ReferenceSF! I noticed your contributions to Pomona College and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katherine Delmar Burke School (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katherine Delmar Burke School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Katherine Delmar Burke School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ReferenceSF! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ReferenceSF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This account is not sock puppetry. The draft was created by the experienced user who suggested that it be included in the article. Please unblock. Please also restore the work as I was fine tuning edits and working with the suggestion to increase the formality of the tone by the experienced editor who read the draft and suggested inclusion in the main article. Please look at the quality of the work and include that even if you block me as a second option. I appealed the block on the 2601 address last night and the response was that they could not find a block. I then created my one and only wikipedia account and am using wikipedia exactly as I promised in the unblock appeal: collaborating with more experienced editors, learning the ropes, etc.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= This account is not sock puppetry. The draft was created by the experienced user who suggested that it be included in the article. Please unblock. Please also restore the work as I was fine tuning edits and working with the suggestion to increase the formality of the tone by the experienced editor who read the draft and suggested inclusion in the main article. Please look at the quality of the work and include that even if you block me as a second option. I appealed the block on the 2601 address last night and the response was that they could not find a block. I then created my one and only wikipedia account and am using wikipedia exactly as I promised in the unblock appeal: collaborating with more experienced editors, learning the ropes, etc. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= This account is not sock puppetry. The draft was created by the experienced user who suggested that it be included in the article. Please unblock. Please also restore the work as I was fine tuning edits and working with the suggestion to increase the formality of the tone by the experienced editor who read the draft and suggested inclusion in the main article. Please look at the quality of the work and include that even if you block me as a second option. I appealed the block on the 2601 address last night and the response was that they could not find a block. I then created my one and only wikipedia account and am using wikipedia exactly as I promised in the unblock appeal: collaborating with more experienced editors, learning the ropes, etc. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= This account is not sock puppetry. The draft was created by the experienced user who suggested that it be included in the article. Please unblock. Please also restore the work as I was fine tuning edits and working with the suggestion to increase the formality of the tone by the experienced editor who read the draft and suggested inclusion in the main article. Please look at the quality of the work and include that even if you block me as a second option. I appealed the block on the 2601 address last night and the response was that they could not find a block. I then created my one and only wikipedia account and am using wikipedia exactly as I promised in the unblock appeal: collaborating with more experienced editors, learning the ropes, etc. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

ReferenceSF (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't know what you're referring to ("the 2601 address"). As for the draft, what you're saying is wrong: you created the draft; the "experienced editor" reviewed it.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, what I meant by the draft is that I was not the person who linked it to the other page. I put it in my sandbox, and the experienced editor took it and put it in drafts and then suggested it be added to the existing article. For the 2601 that is my IP address that was set to expire from a block today. Last night I asked about the block and someone from Wikipedia couldn't find it. My intentions are true. This is my only wikipedia account. Please unblock. Thank you.ReferenceSF (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, but your reply is not helpful or fully responsive to my questions. Another admin will review your unblock request.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I tried my best, sorry that it was not helpful. My intentions are honest. Template:Ping:Bbb23 I may have missed your questions and am happy to answer them if you'll provide a list. Thanks for reconsidering. ReferenceSF (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)ReferenceSF (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2022 (UTC)