Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tundenny: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ginbopewz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
*'''Delete''' Per nom, cannot find any SIGCOV about subject. [[User:Elbatli|Elbatli]] ([[User talk:Elbatli|talk]]) 19:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Per nom, cannot find any SIGCOV about subject. [[User:Elbatli|Elbatli]] ([[User talk:Elbatli|talk]]) 19:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per comment of KH-1. [[User:Ginbopewz|Ginbopewz]] ([[User talk:Ginbopewz|talk]]) 11:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
*'''Speedy delete''' per comment of KH-1. [[User:Ginbopewz|Ginbopewz]] ([[User talk:Ginbopewz|talk]]) 11:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. I cannot find coverage of this individual outside of [[WP:SPS]]. There is no indication that he passes [[WP:NBASIC]] or [[WP:NARTIST]]. This might well be a [[WP:G11]], but we're already this far along in an AfD... — [[User:Mhawk10|Mhawk10]] ([[User talk:Mhawk10 |talk]]) 06:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:23, 5 March 2022

Tundenny (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any coverage in WP:RS for "Tundenny" or for "Sulaimon Babatunde" at all in my searches. The references provided are his social media pages, two unreliable content scrapers and two thinly-veiled press releases. There is no evidence of actual notability. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]