Talk:Fingering (sexual act): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:28, 7 March 2022

Sexology and sexuality Start‑class High‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

This article was nominated for deletion on January 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fingering (sexual act) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Prostate massage

I added a new section regarding the prostate massage through fingering the prostate gland in men here and it has been reverted by User:Crossroads citing it as tangential topic and it was also pointed out that Psychology Today is a poor source for reference. Since, I don't know much about the weight-age of different websites and perhaps someone could help me understand how we decide a source as good or bad and whether we have any objective measure or just subjective opinion. Further, even if the source is poor still there is no denying that this is a known topic which also has wiki article. IMO, the revert was done in uncaring and thoughtless manner. Isn't it better to think about the merits and demerits of the edits rather than to just simple revert it in a haste manner to display authoritativeness to new users? Humansexuality (talk) 04:51, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did think about it, and it remains that this is WP:UNDUE. Prostate stimulation is already covered and does not need its own subheading. Crossroads ^-talk- 22:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely hope that you are intelligent enough to not think that people will fall for your obscure justifications and your evasion like you didn't address any of the points raised. As I checked your contributions, I found that many of your edits are just reverts to intimidate new users as an act of bullying or to just increase your edit numbers or both. I am requesting you to not engage in this act of Vandalism or I have to involve admins and let them decide the quality of your edit and all of your contributions and whether your act of vandalism is against Wikipedia policies, which I am sure would be although I don't know about that as of now. I don't want your account to be blocked by admins so I leave it to you to improve the reverts that you have made. Humansexuality (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Safety and Sexual Assault

Re. "For example, penetration without consent of the vagina or anus with a finger is called 'rape' in Australia[18] and 'forcible rape' in the US.": how does a vagina or asshole consent? And how does either do so "with a finger"? Really, the writing on Wikipedia is so crappy most of the time. 107.147.183.77 (talk) 18:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:28, 7 March 2022 edit 107.147.183.77 (talk) Bad writing ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:28, 7 March 2022 edit undo 107.147.183.77 (talk) →Safety and Sexual Assault Next edit →
Line 18:		Line 18:
	== Safety and Sexual Assault ==		== Safety and Sexual Assault ==

	Re. "For example, penetration without consent of the vagina or anus with a finger is called "rape" in Australia[18] and "forcible rape" in the US.": how does a vagina or asshole consent? And how does either do so "with a finger"? Really, the writing on Wikipedia is so crappy most of the time. [[Special:Contributions/107.147.183.77\|107.147.183.77]] ([[User talk:107.147.183.77\|talk]]) 18:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)		Re. "For example, penetration without consent of the vagina or anus with a finger is called 'rape' in Australia[18] and 'forcible rape' in the US.": how does a vagina or asshole consent? And how does either do so "with a finger"? Really, the writing on Wikipedia is so crappy most of the time. [[Special:Contributions/107.147.183.77\|107.147.183.77]] ([[User talk:107.147.183.77\|talk]]) 18:28, 7 March 2022 (UTC)