Jump to content

Talk:Michael McFaul: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (C): banner shell, Biography, University of Oxford (Low), International relations, Montana, United States, Russia, Stanford University, California (Rater)
Line 101: Line 101:


This article needs a good section regarding McFaul's role as US ambassador during the [[2013-14 Ukraine crisis]]. All the more important in light of his nearly ubiquitous presence on US television during the [[2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis|current Ukraine crisis]]. [[User:Anomalous+0|Anomalous+0]] ([[User talk:Anomalous+0|talk]]) 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This article needs a good section regarding McFaul's role as US ambassador during the [[2013-14 Ukraine crisis]]. All the more important in light of his nearly ubiquitous presence on US television during the [[2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis|current Ukraine crisis]]. [[User:Anomalous+0|Anomalous+0]] ([[User talk:Anomalous+0|talk]]) 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

== Maddow show comments 03-11-22 ==

https://twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1502499687290617856?s=21
McFaul seems to have appeared on MSNBC advocating a position that [[Adolf Hitler]]’s victims who died in the [[Holocaust]] were not [[German]]. This seems to me to be a position advocated by German [[Nazis]] notably contrary to fact, and as a particular ideological aim of those [[Nazis]] in order to maintain domestic German political support for the [[Holocaust]]. Discussion of these remarks may continue in coming days and will probably merit mention on McFaul’s page here as a notable part of his record as a public and diplomatic figure.[[Special:Contributions/2601:193:8301:AA30:B898:9016:EB4D:F34E|2601:193:8301:AA30:B898:9016:EB4D:F34E]] ([[User talk:2601:193:8301:AA30:B898:9016:EB4D:F34E|talk]]) 09:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:53, 12 March 2022

SAT?

Michael McFaul is a renowned scholar on Russia and democracy, the inclusion of what he got in the SAT when he was 16 is rather trite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.20.105 (talk) 04:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Just for the record, I have deleted the bulk of the text from this article, as it was an almost word for word copy/paste from http://seaf.stanford.edu/people/michaelamcfaul/. Joshdboz (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Radical

I'm not sure "radical" is an appropriate term for McFaul. It implies that he is somehow outside of the mainstream. In fact two days ago (19 Feb 2009) he was appointed director of the White House National Security Council: http://fsi.stanford.edu/news/stanfords_michael_mcfaul_named_special_assistant_to_the_president_for_national_security_affairs_and_senior_director_at_the_national_security_council_20090219/

Without anymore context, his quote also seems misleading. It is an old passage from 2002, and his viewpoints have seemed to evolve over the years. I am deleting his quote, adding in the factual information about his appointment and I will leave it up to others to explain his positions. Kramer (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confrontation with NTV

If someone can add this to the article or find better sources. McFaul is allegedly being harassed by news reporters.

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137410/timothy-naftali/george-kennan-michael-mcfaul-and-their-paranoid-hosts?page=show

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiSbnW0llCw — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.163.111 (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael McFaul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael McFaul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Michael McFaul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political views

This information has been reverted:

In July 2019, McFaul wrote that Communist Party of China's officials "champion the advantages of their system — an ability to undertake massive infrastructure projects, the capacity to manage income inequalities and a commitment to harmony in government and society. In contrast, polarized U.S. politics in the Trump era seem to impede any major initiative, be it infrastructure development or addressing income inequality."[1]

References

  1. ^ "China is winning the ideological battle with the U.S." The Washington Post. July 23, 2019.

I think it is relevant and should be included. -- Tobby72 (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why? The best way to gauge relevance here is probably to look at whether or not anyone else covered the opinion - I don't see evidence of that. There's no real context for this quote, and people write editorials all the time. I'm not sure why we would choose to include this one. Nblund talk 19:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I also fail to understand why this should be included. Or why you chose to place this under "Career". McFaul is a Global Opinions Writer for the Washington Post so it's no surprise that he has publicly held views. I'm cursious as to why this passage, and only this one, belongs to this page. Pilaz (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Glaring omission: Ukraine

This article needs a good section regarding McFaul's role as US ambassador during the 2013-14 Ukraine crisis. All the more important in light of his nearly ubiquitous presence on US television during the current Ukraine crisis. Anomalous+0 (talk) 08:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maddow show comments 03-11-22

https://twitter.com/maddowblog/status/1502499687290617856?s=21 McFaul seems to have appeared on MSNBC advocating a position that Adolf Hitler’s victims who died in the Holocaust were not German. This seems to me to be a position advocated by German Nazis notably contrary to fact, and as a particular ideological aim of those Nazis in order to maintain domestic German political support for the Holocaust. Discussion of these remarks may continue in coming days and will probably merit mention on McFaul’s page here as a notable part of his record as a public and diplomatic figure.2601:193:8301:AA30:B898:9016:EB4D:F34E (talk) 09:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]