Jump to content

Talk:Medjed: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PrimeBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Task 24: template substitution following a TFD
amogus: Reply
Line 57: Line 57:
this page is being more popular, because it looks like the character of [[among us]] --[[User:Zemxer|Zemxer]] ([[User talk:Zemxer|talk]]) 12:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
this page is being more popular, because it looks like the character of [[among us]] --[[User:Zemxer|Zemxer]] ([[User talk:Zemxer|talk]]) 12:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
'''among them'''
'''among them'''

:Sus [[User:Savage Almond|Savage Almond]] ([[User talk:Savage Almond|talk]]) 20:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:08, 12 March 2022

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 16 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anakinsmommy710.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medjed (god). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stub vs excessive information

I have had an edit to this page reverted for "excessive information", but the page is listed as a stub. Should the stub listing be removed if additional information is to be considered "excessive", or do other editors have expanded edits in progress?

SeaOfBones (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's room for substantive information about the god's portrayal in media, such as summaries of analyses of media observers. But mere mentions in the vein of "he appeared in video game X" are generally discouraged in Wikipedia as accumulations of trivia. Sandstein 17:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 3 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Colin M (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Medjed (god)Medjed – Clearly the primary topic with far more pageviews than the fish. Disambiguation page unnecessary per WP:TWODABS. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 15:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Persona 5 reference could probably be added to the "Internet meme" section if it was renamed "Cultural impact". As it's explicitly related to its popularity in Japan as a meme, Medjed being a supposed hacker group and all.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Duplication of information

The two sections, Book of the Dead and New Kingdom "Papyri", essentially duplicate the same information from different aspects. Both are quotes from the Book of the Dead, with the second one simply being slightly longer. I have the Budge book which is one of the references. The book is based on the Papyrus of Ani, which Wikipedia itself admits is a New Kingdom text. This is the 17th chapter/spell, as mentioned in the other section. I hate to make a stub article shorter, but there is absolutely no reason to keep both these sections.

amogus

this page is being more popular, because it looks like the character of among us --Zemxer (talk) 12:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC) among them[reply]

Sus Savage Almond (talk) 20:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]