Jump to content

Talk:City of Salford: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Redrose64 moved page Talk:Salford Metropolitan Borough to Talk:City of Salford: send this mis-moved page back to where it came from - stage 2
Salford Metropolitan Borough or City of Salford?: ust because editors with odd, unreferenced points of view insert incorrect information doesn't mean there is an argument to change something that is correct and has endured since the article was created.
Line 119: Line 119:
:[[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]], you are in a minority of yourself. It has never been called Salford Metropolitan Borough, it is the City of Salford and that is the consensus. [[User:Esemgee|Esemgee]] ([[User talk:Esemgee|talk]]) 15:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
:[[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]], you are in a minority of yourself. It has never been called Salford Metropolitan Borough, it is the City of Salford and that is the consensus. [[User:Esemgee|Esemgee]] ([[User talk:Esemgee|talk]]) 15:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Esemgee}}, far from a "minority of myself" as you put it. If you took the time to look at history tabs, you'd see others like {{Ping|Dr.AndrewBamford}} also question the name of the article and anons...[[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]] ([[User talk:DragonofBatley|talk]]) 16:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
:{{Ping|Esemgee}}, far from a "minority of myself" as you put it. If you took the time to look at history tabs, you'd see others like {{Ping|Dr.AndrewBamford}} also question the name of the article and anons...[[User:DragonofBatley|DragonofBatley]] ([[User talk:DragonofBatley|talk]]) 16:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

::Just because editors with odd, unreferenced points of view insert incorrect information doesn't mean there is an argument to change something that is correct and has endured since the article was created. [[User:Esemgee|Esemgee]] ([[User talk:Esemgee|talk]]) 20:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


== Article name ==
== Article name ==

Revision as of 20:12, 12 March 2022

Good articleCity of Salford has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on City of Salford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on City of Salford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on City of Salford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on City of Salford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Salford#Salford_City_Debate (8 January 2020)

Challenging long established content

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#City_of_Salford_being_constantly_changed_by_anon%2Fs - please direct your issues raised to here please anon...thanks DragonofBatley (talk) 06:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salford Metropolitan Borough or City of Salford?

Seems to be an argument for removing the use of City of Salford to Salford Metropolitan Borough and vice versa so what's the concensus then? It'll just keep being changed and reverted without a concensus? DragonofBatley (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DragonofBatley, you are in a minority of yourself. It has never been called Salford Metropolitan Borough, it is the City of Salford and that is the consensus. Esemgee (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Esemgee:, far from a "minority of myself" as you put it. If you took the time to look at history tabs, you'd see others like @Dr.AndrewBamford: also question the name of the article and anons...DragonofBatley (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just because editors with odd, unreferenced points of view insert incorrect information doesn't mean there is an argument to change something that is correct and has endured since the article was created. Esemgee (talk) 20:12, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

The name of the article clearly has a typo in it. "Ciy" must be intended to be "City". 2A04:AE00:2811:1200:E83D:FB0F:9760:B89 (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]