Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J9A10: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:44, 13 February 2007

Update - There's a verbatim copy of the article at J9A10 (card game), which should be deleted as well. --McGeddon 12:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

whoa, DELETE!. Super long long article that I'll bet (no pun intended..) is a mere copy from their site. This search does nothing at all to help give me even a hint that they could perhaps just maybe be notable. Thus delete. Mathmo ^Talk 11:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a closer look Let us not make the mistake of judging a book by its cover. This is not a gambling site It is surprising that we are talking about deleting the reference to the only available online version of the most popular card game in Kerala, India. There are a few million Keralaties in the world and they will not be too happy with this attitude of Wikipedia Editorial Staff, Is there no single person who edits Wikipedia from Kerala India to bring reason to the table! --Kerala Online 11:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam. Wikipedia is not a game guide. Also, if a "few million" Keralaties in the world cared about this game enough, there would have been an article on it already. Hopefully one of them will rewrite a new article that does not violate Wikipedia policy - assuming the game really is notable. Resolute 23:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this article is clearly spam. Even if the subject had some merit, the content is too clearly infused with spammy references to the site the article's author is clearly promoting. --Muldrake 02:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the author is listening The page has been changed and the spammy references have been removed. --Kerala Online 02:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:43, 13 February 2007 edit 71.250.232.151 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:44, 13 February 2007 edit undo 71.250.232.151 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*'''Delete''', this article is clearly spam. Even if the subject had some merit, the content is too clearly infused with spammy references to the site the article's author is clearly promoting. --[[User:Muldrake\|Muldrake]] 02:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)		*'''Delete''', this article is clearly spam. Even if the subject had some merit, the content is too clearly infused with spammy references to the site the article's author is clearly promoting. --[[User:Muldrake\|Muldrake]] 02:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

	*'''Looks like the author is listening''' The page has been changed and the spammy references have been removed. ~~<small>—The preceding~~ [[~~Wikipedia~~:~~Sign your posts on talk pages~~\|~~unsigned]]~~ ~~comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/71.250.232.151\|71.250.232.151~~]] ~~([[User talk:71.250.232.151\|talk]])~~ 02:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)~~.</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned -->~~		*'''Looks like the author is listening''' The page has been changed and the spammy references have been removed. --[[User:J9A10\|Kerala Online]] 02:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)