Talk:Creature: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jemiller226 (talk | contribs) Split or what? |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I asked for this article to be split because of the [[Magic: The Gathering]] content, which is not at all related to the description of "creature" as an animal or animalistic human being. Really what I think should happen is the article split and then merge the section on Magic into the article ''about'' Magic, where it would be more useful. --[[User:Jemiller226|Jemiller226]] 05:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC) |
I asked for this article to be split because of the [[Magic: The Gathering]] content, which is not at all related to the description of "creature" as an animal or animalistic human being. Really what I think should happen is the article split and then merge the section on Magic into the article ''about'' Magic, where it would be more useful. --[[User:Jemiller226|Jemiller226]] 05:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC) |
||
==creatures== |
|||
What about creatures -- like "Wikipedia Creature"? Is there a wikipedia creature out there? |
|||
Revision as of 03:08, 13 February 2007
I've added the VfD notice as it's been listed and so the notice should have been added. Personally I have voted to keep it. See VfD. Andrewa 19:50, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Split or what?
I asked for this article to be split because of the Magic: The Gathering content, which is not at all related to the description of "creature" as an animal or animalistic human being. Really what I think should happen is the article split and then merge the section on Magic into the article about Magic, where it would be more useful. --Jemiller226 05:22, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
creatures
What about creatures -- like "Wikipedia Creature"? Is there a wikipedia creature out there?