Jump to content

Talk:Insurgency in Balochistan: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Insurgency in Balochistan/Archive 2. (BOT)
Line 50: Line 50:


{{ping|AnM2002}} {{ping|OrientIs}} {{ping|Farewells}} I would like to make an argument to classify the insurgency in Balochistan as currently low-intensity, rather than edit warring we should talk about the issue here. My argument for the insurgency of Balochistan being [[Low-Intensity conflict|low-intensity]] is because excluding that word implies there is conventional warfare, with organized structure and frontlines, as defined by the very own Wikipedia article on insurgency. This is not happening on any large scale in the province. The insurgency in Balochistan is below the scale of a conventional war, classifying it as low-intensity. While there has been an uptick in attacks, as per [https://www.satp.org/datasheet-terrorist-attack/fatalities/pakistan-balochistan SATP], the numbers are still far below those seen in the early 2010s. If the numbers go up to those seen in the early 2010s, or if there is verifiable proof of proper conventional war taking place (like did in KPK with the TTP a decade ago), then I say we should change the article to "insurgency" proper status -- [[User:Abbasi786786|Abbasi786786]] ([[User talk:Abbasi786786|talk]]) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
{{ping|AnM2002}} {{ping|OrientIs}} {{ping|Farewells}} I would like to make an argument to classify the insurgency in Balochistan as currently low-intensity, rather than edit warring we should talk about the issue here. My argument for the insurgency of Balochistan being [[Low-Intensity conflict|low-intensity]] is because excluding that word implies there is conventional warfare, with organized structure and frontlines, as defined by the very own Wikipedia article on insurgency. This is not happening on any large scale in the province. The insurgency in Balochistan is below the scale of a conventional war, classifying it as low-intensity. While there has been an uptick in attacks, as per [https://www.satp.org/datasheet-terrorist-attack/fatalities/pakistan-balochistan SATP], the numbers are still far below those seen in the early 2010s. If the numbers go up to those seen in the early 2010s, or if there is verifiable proof of proper conventional war taking place (like did in KPK with the TTP a decade ago), then I say we should change the article to "insurgency" proper status -- [[User:Abbasi786786|Abbasi786786]] ([[User talk:Abbasi786786|talk]]) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
:Your [[WP:OR|own assessment]] is not going to supersede the data from multiple reliable sources,[https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2022/02/08/baloch-insurgency-and-continued-tale-of-apathy-and-violence/][https://gandhara.rferl.org/a/pakistan-balochistan-violence-conflict-military-separatists/31695168.html] which clearly state that the insurgency has been intensified. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 12:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:14, 16 March 2022

Iran in the belligerents section

There is already another article titled "Sistan and Baluchestan insurgency". So can Iran be removed from the belligerents section and the remaining information about Iran moved to this article[[1]]?-Mountain157 (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

India

@Kashmiri: Your "better source" here is not exactly a better but same as all others that we have seen until now. Pakistan's own government or their representatives claiming that India is supporting Balochistan insurgency is far from being a third party reliable source. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 10:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

India supports Baloch insurgents

India should be listed as a supporter for Baloch insurgents. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/southasia/2016/09/05/india-must-remember-that-balochistan-is-not-bangladesh/ https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32604137 https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/what-the-kulbhushan-jadhav-saga-reveals-about-india-and-pakistans-balochistan-problems/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.117.185.160 (talk) 01:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Low-Intensity Insurgency

@AnM2002: @OrientIs: @Farewells: I would like to make an argument to classify the insurgency in Balochistan as currently low-intensity, rather than edit warring we should talk about the issue here. My argument for the insurgency of Balochistan being low-intensity is because excluding that word implies there is conventional warfare, with organized structure and frontlines, as defined by the very own Wikipedia article on insurgency. This is not happening on any large scale in the province. The insurgency in Balochistan is below the scale of a conventional war, classifying it as low-intensity. While there has been an uptick in attacks, as per SATP, the numbers are still far below those seen in the early 2010s. If the numbers go up to those seen in the early 2010s, or if there is verifiable proof of proper conventional war taking place (like did in KPK with the TTP a decade ago), then I say we should change the article to "insurgency" proper status -- Abbasi786786 (talk) 14:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your own assessment is not going to supersede the data from multiple reliable sources,[2][3] which clearly state that the insurgency has been intensified. Orientls (talk) 12:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]