Talk:Abby Johnson (activist): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:20, 16 March 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abby Johnson (activist) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 45 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 29 July 2016, see discussion.
keep, 30 June 2011, see discussion.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Problems with today's addition

I deleted today's addition first because an unverified YouTube podcast is not a WP:RS. It was re-added with a deprecated unreliable source, so it needs to be deleted again. Furthermore, the category Category:American traditionalist Catholics falls under WP:EGRS and the accompanying high standards of sourcing and self-identification. If Johnson does not explicitly call herself a "Traditionalist" in a WP:RS then we cannot apply the category. I am unable to revert further due to WP:1RR. Elizium23 (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and have reverted. —JBL (talk) 11:47, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Oh, goodness, are we having trouble with her Catholic status again?" quickly slides to "Oy, have I been editing this article for nine years now?!?" --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:11, 1 September 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

change anti-abortion to pro-life Nicoleta E. Luca (talk) 11:47, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, there is a well-established consensus not to use less accurate and more polemical terms when accurate, neutral terms are available. See e.g. this discussion from the talk-page archive. --JBL (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is consensus to NOT use that term THROUGHOUT Wikipedia's articles: Please see Talk:Anti-abortion movements/FAQ Q: "Should this article's title be pro-life movement?" A: No. Wikipedia does not use euphemisms. The term "pro-life" is a branding or marketing device and does not reflect the sole focus of the movement, which is opposition to abortion. The fact that the two sides officially call themselves "pro-life" and "pro-choice" is not a reason for Wikipedia to prefer those terms, since neither is neutral, nor accurately describes their positions. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 23:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with Avatar317 above. StarHOG (Talk) 14:54, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 September 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

CHANGE: “ compared to Norma McCorvey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade, the United States Supreme Court case that legalized abortion in 1973. McCorvey joined the anti-abortion movement in 1995.[14]”

TO: compared to Norma McCorvey, the "Jane Roe" of Roe v. Wade, the United States Supreme Court case that legalized abortion in 1973. McCorvey joined the anti-abortion movement in 1995[14] and later admitted that she never really supported the anti-choice movement, but “took their money and they put me out in front of the camera and told me what to say, and that’s what I’d say.”

CITATION: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/jane-roe-from-roe-v-wade-made-a-stunning-deathbed-confession-now-what/2020/05/20/fad9d296-9a09-11ea-89fd-28fb313d1886_story.html%3foutputType=amp 2601:600:C67F:6030:D021:BE5:7A3D:D561 (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: WP:COATRACK; what McCorvey has done or claims to have done is irrelevant to a biography about Abby Johnson. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 20:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change "insurrectionists" to "peaceful pro-democracy protesters." Beriajohn (talk) 00:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template.--JBL (talk) 01:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Section for Racial Profiling

Her comments on racial profiling need there own section because judging upon the controversy of the statements, they are less of “political statements” and more on the specific issue of racial profiling. I mean this in an unbiased way. Wheresaaronat (talk) 22:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 Change "insurrectionists" to "peaceful pro-democracy protesters." [[User:Beriajohn|Beriajohn]] ([[User talk:Beriajohn|talk]]) 00:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 : [[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done for now:''' please establish a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for this alteration '''[[Wikipedia:Edit requests|before]]''' using the {{tlx|edit semi-protected}} template.<!-- Template:ESp -->--[[User:JayBeeEll|JBL]] ([[User_talk:JayBeeEll|talk]]) 01:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
+== Separate Section for Racial Profiling ==
+Her comments on racial profiling need there own section because judging upon the controversy of the statements, they are less of “political statements” and more on the specific issue of racial profiling. I mean this in an unbiased way. [[User:Wheresaaronat|Wheresaaronat]] ([[User talk:Wheresaaronat|talk]]) 22:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)