Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skills for Care

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Defaulting to Keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Skills for Care

Skills for Care (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alleged to be a csd G-11 article, but its been here a while and without the additional iffy material it may have a chance. Letting the community settle this one. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

• Comment I keep finding passing mentions of this (service?) in various articles, such as in the Guardian --> [1] -- along with the words "prestigious" and "prestigious awards" and similar characterizing. It seems the Brits like this one, but I haven't found it to be the actual subject of articles yet. Steve Quinn (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

On a lark I tried "Google Scholar" and found this: [2]. And I don't know how good a source this would be: [3]. And this might qualify for significant coverage [4] ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:47, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:13, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 01:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

• Weak keep, or possibly WP:SMERGE to Social care in England. Not particularly promotional in its present form, and appears to have some just-about-significant coverage on The Guardians website [5] and in books about social care, e.g. [6] [7]. Not sure if it's really worth a separate article to itself, but I guess there are quite a few other similar articles in Category:Sector Skills Councils, and merging might lose the infobox. Qwfp (talk) 12:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.